PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - David A Hurtado
AU  - Cassandra A Okechukwu
AU  - Orfeu M Buxton
AU  - Leslie Hammer
AU  - Ginger C Hanson
AU  - Phyllis Moen
AU  - Laura C Klein
AU  - Lisa F Berkman
TI  - Effects on cigarette consumption of a work–family supportive organisational intervention: 6-month results from the work, family and health network study
AID  - 10.1136/jech-2015-206953
DP  - 2016 Dec 01
TA  - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
PG  - 1155--1161
VI  - 70
IP  - 12
4099  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/70/12/1155.short
4100  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/70/12/1155.full
SO  - J Epidemiol Community Health2016 Dec 01; 70
AB  - Background Observational studies have linked work–family issues with cigarette consumption. This study examined the 6-month effects on cigarette consumption of a work–family supportive organisational intervention among nursing home workers.Methods Group randomised controlled trial where 30 nursing homes across New England states were randomly assigned to either usual practice or to a 4-month intervention aimed at reducing work–family conflict via increased schedule control and family supportive supervisory behaviours (FSSB). Cigarette consumption was based on self-reported number of cigarettes per week, measured at the individual level.Results A total of 1524 direct-care workers were enrolled in the trial. Cigarette consumption was prevalent in 30% of the sample, consuming an average of 77 cigarettes/week. Smokers at intervention sites reduced cigarette consumption by 7.12 cigarettes, while no reduction was observed among smokers at usual practice sites (b=−7.12, 95% CI −13.83 to −0.40, p<0.05) (d=−0.15). The majority of smokers were US-born White nursing assistants, and among this subgroup, the reduction in cigarette consumption was stronger (b=−12.77, 95% CI −22.31 to −3.22, p<0.05) (d=−0.27). Although the intervention prevented a decline in FSSB (d=0.08), effects on cigarette consumption were not mediated by FSSB.Conclusions Cigarette consumption was reduced among smokers at organisations where a work–family supportive intervention was implemented. This effect, however, was not explained by specific targets of the intervention, but other psychosocial pathways related to the work–family interface.Trial registration number NCT02050204; results.