PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - C Bambra
AU  - K E Smith
AU  - K Garthwaite
AU  - K E Joyce
AU  - D J Hunter
TI  - A labour of Sisyphus? Public policy and health inequalities research from the Black and Acheson Reports to the Marmot Review
AID  - 10.1136/jech.2010.111195
DP  - 2011 May 01
TA  - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
PG  - 399--406
VI  - 65
IP  - 5
4099  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/65/5/399.short
4100  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/65/5/399.full
SO  - J Epidemiol Community Health2011 May 01; 65
AB  - Objectives To explore similarities and differences in policy content and the political context of the three main English government reports on health inequalities: the Black Report (1980), the Acheson Enquiry (1998), and the Marmot Review (2010).Methods Thematic policy and context analysis of the Black Report (1980), the Acheson Enquiry (1998), and the Marmot Review (2010) in terms of: (i) underpinning theoretical principles; (ii) policy recommendations; (iii) the political contexts in which each was released; and (iv) their actual or potential influence on research and policy.Results There were great similarities and very few differences in terms of both the theoretical principles guiding the recommendations of these reports and the focus of the recommendations themselves. However, there were clear differences in terms of the political contexts of each report, as well as their subsequent impacts on research and policy.Conclusion The paper calls into question the progress of health inequalities research, the use of evidence and of the links between research, politics and policy.