RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Do different scales measure the same construct? Three Sense of Coherence scales
JF Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JO J Epidemiol Community Health
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP 166
OP 167
DO 10.1136/jech.2007.063420
VO 63
IS 2
A1 M Olsson
A1 J Gassne
A1 K Hansson
YR 2009
UL http://jech.bmj.com/content/63/2/166.abstract
AB Background: Different scales claim to measure the construct “Sense of Coherence”. Results from these scales have been compared without knowing whether they measure the same construct. This article compares two versions of Antonovsky’s original scale (SOC-13 and SOC-29), translated into Swedish, and a three-item scale (SOC-3) that claims to measure Sense of Coherence.Methods: The data were analysed in a cross-sectional setting. The study consisted of university students studying social work (n = 395).Results: The original scales had no distribution problems in differentiating Sense of Coherence. The SOC-3 had severe distribution problems. The two versions of the original Sense of Coherence scale had an acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α; SOC-29 = 0.93, SOC-13 = 0.89). The SOC-3 scale did not have an acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.39). SOC-29 and SOC-13 had a high intercorrelation (r = 0.96, p<0.001). The SOC-3 significantly correlated with SOC-29 (r = −0.72, p<0.001) and SOC-13 (r = −0.67, p<0.001), but the magnitude was significantly lower than the intercorrelation between SOC-29 and SOC-13 (Fisher’s z-transformation, p<0.001).Conclusions: Because scales that claim to measure the same construct are not always interchangeable, researchers should make sure they compare results from studies that use the same scales.