PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Christian von Wagner AU - Katherine Knight AU - Andrew Steptoe AU - Jane Wardle TI - Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults AID - 10.1136/jech.2006.053967 DP - 2007 Dec 01 TA - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health PG - 1086--1090 VI - 61 IP - 12 4099 - http://jech.bmj.com/content/61/12/1086.short 4100 - http://jech.bmj.com/content/61/12/1086.full SO - J Epidemiol Community Health2007 Dec 01; 61 AB - Objectives: To measure the prevalence of limited functional health literacy in the UK, and examine associations with health behaviours and self-rated health.Design: Psychometric testing using a British version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) in a population sample of adults.Setting: UK-wide interview survey (excluding Northern Ireland and the Scottish Isles).Participants: 759 adults (439 women, 320 men) aged 18–90 years (mean age _ 47.6 years) selected using random location sampling.Main outcome measures: Functional health literacy, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, physical exercise and smoking.Results: We found that 11.4% of participants had either marginal or inadequate health literacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk of having limitations in health literacy increased with age (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06), being male (odds ratio _ 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.55), low educational attainment (odds ratio _ 7.46; 95% confidence interval 3.35 to 16.58) and low income (odds ratio _ 5.94; 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 18.89). In a second multivariable logistic regression analysis, every point higher on the health literacy scale increased the likelihood of eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.003 to 1.03), being a non-smoker (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.0003 to 1.03) and having good self-rated health (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.04), independently of age, education, gender, ethnicity and income.Conclusions: The results encourage efforts to monitor health literacy in the British population and examine associations with engagement with preventative health behaviours.