Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Overall and race-specific associations between state-level minimum wage policy and food insecurity in the United States
  1. Sophia L Freije1,
  2. Maeve Wallace2,3,4,
  3. M Pia Chaparro5,6
  1. 1 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  2. 2 Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  3. 3 Mary Amelia Center for Women's Health Equity Research, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  4. 4 Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  5. 5 Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  6. 6 Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr M Pia Chaparro; pchap{at}uw.edu

Abstract

Background In the USA, states can set higher minimum wages than the federal government. We investigated the association between state minimum wages and racial/ethnic inequities in food insecurity.

Methods Household-level food insecurity and sociodemographic data were obtained from the cross-sectional Current Population Survey 2015–2019 (n=189 665 households) and merged by state and year with minimum wage and cost-of-living data obtained from the US Department of Labor and US Bureau of Economic Analysis, respectively. We fitted Poisson regression models with robust standard errors with 12-month or 30-day household food insecurity as the outcome, and minimum wage or inflation-adjusted minimum wage (ie, real wage) as the predictor, adjusting for cost of living, sociodemographic covariates and state fixed-effects. We tested interactions between minimum wage and race/ethnicity and ran race/ethnicity-stratified models.

Results In adjusted models, the real wage was not associated with 12-month or 30-day food insecurity. Minimum wage was associated with 5% lower prevalence rate of 12-month food insecurity (PR 0.95, 95% CI=0.93 to 0.98) and 7% lower prevalence rate of 30-day food insecurity (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96) for all households. The interaction p values for race/ethnicity with real wage and minimum wage were p<0.001. In stratified models, results were statistically significant for minimum wage and 12-month food insecurity among non-Hispanic (NH) white households (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) and Hispanic households (PR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), and minimum wage and 30-day food insecurity among NH white (PR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96), NH black (PR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99) and Hispanic (PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95) households.

Conclusions Higher state-level minimum wages, but not real wages, were associated with lower food insecurity prevalence overall and for racial/ethnic subgroups.

  • FOOD INSECURITY
  • Health inequalities
  • NUTRITION
  • PUBLIC HEALTH

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors MPC and MW planned the study. SLP acquired the data. SLP conducted the analysis under the supervision of MPC. SLP, MW and MPC interpreted the results. SLP wrote the manuscript. MPC and MW edited the manuscript. SLP submitted the manuscript. SLP, MW and MPC approved the final version of the manuscript for submission. MPC is the guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Map disclaimer The inclusion of any map (including the depiction of any boundaries therein), or of any geographic or locational reference, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. Any such expression remains solely that of the relevant source and is not endorsed by BMJ. Maps are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.