Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Maternal cigarette smoking before or during pregnancy increases the risk of severe neonatal morbidity after delivery: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study
    1. 1 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    2. 2 Clinical Research Center, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    3. 3 Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
    4. 4 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
    5. 5 Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    6. 6 Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    1. Correspondence to Dr Bo Xi, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; xibo2010{at}sdu.edu.cn

    Abstract

    Background The association of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy with severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) is still inconclusive. We aimed to examine the associations of the timing and the intensity of maternal cigarette smoking with infant SNM in the USA.

    Methods We used birth certificate data of 12 150 535 women aged 18–49 years who had live singleton births from the 2016–2019 US National Vital Statistics System. Women self-reported the daily number of cigarettes they consumed before pregnancy and in each trimester of pregnancy. Composite SNM was defined as one or more of the following complications: assisted ventilation immediately following delivery, assisted ventilation for >6 hours, neonatal intensive care unit admission, surfactant replacement therapy, suspected neonatal sepsis, and seizure.

    Results Maternal cigarette smoking either before pregnancy or during any trimester of pregnancy significantly increased the risk of infant SNM, even at a very low intensity (ie, 1–2 cigarettes per day). For example, compared with women who did not smoke before pregnancy, the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (OR, 95% CI) of composite SNM in the newborn from women who smoked 1–2, 3–5, 6–9, 10–19, and ≥20 cigarettes per day before pregnancy were 1.16 (1.13 to 1.19), 1.22 (1.20 to 1.24), 1.26 (1.23 to 1.29), 1.27 (1.25 to 1.28), and 1.31 (1.30 to 1.33), respectively. Furthermore, smokers who stopped smoking during pregnancy still had a higher risk of composite SNM than never smokers before and throughout pregnancy.

    Conclusions Maternal cigarette smoking before or during pregnancy increased the risk of infant SNM, even at a low dose of 1–2 cigarettes/day. Interventions should emphasise the detrimental effects of even light smoking before and during pregnancy.

    • SMOKING
    • PREGNANCY
    • CONGENITAL, HEREDITARY, AND NEONATAL DISEASES AND ABNORMALITIES

    Data availability statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. The birth certificate data from the National Vital Statistics System are available at the official website (https:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/births.htm).

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. The birth certificate data from the National Vital Statistics System are available at the official website (https:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/births.htm).

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors BX conceptualised the study. LY (Lili Yang) drafted the manuscript. LY (Liu Yang) and HW analysed the data. BX, PB, YG and MZ critically revised the manuscript for key intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. BX is the guarantor. LY (Lili Yang) and LY (Liu Yang) are co-first authors.

    • Funding BX was supported by the Youth Team of Humanistic and Social Science of Shandong University (20820IFYT1902). LY (Lili Yang) was supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZC20231438) and the Shandong Postdoctoral Science Foundation (SDBX2023003). The funders had no role in the study design or implementation; data collection, management, analysis, or interpretation; manuscript preparation, review, or approval; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.