Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Contribution of parental health to the subsequent social assistance entry of the family with children: a nationwide register-linked birth cohort study in Finland
  1. Aapo Hiilamo1,
  2. Markus Keski-Säntti2,
  3. Sami Räsänen3,4,
  4. Mika Niemelä5,
  5. Tea Lallukka6,
  6. Tiina Ristikari1,2
  1. 1 Itla Children's Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2 Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3 Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oulu University, Oulu, Finland
  4. 4 Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
  5. 5 Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  6. 6 Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Aapo Hiilamo, Itla Children's foundation, Helsinki, Finland; aapo.hiilamo{at}itla.fi

Aim

Our aim in this paper was to estimate the contribution of different parental specialised health care diagnoses to the subsequent risk of entry into the social assistance system for families with children in the period 1998–2013.

Methods We used longitudinal population-level register data consisting of all children born in 1997 in Finland and their registered parents (54 960 one and two-parent families with 801 336 observations in the period 1998–2013). Diagnoses assigned in public specialised healthcare and social assistance records were derived from nationwide administrative registers. Measures of parental socioeconomic status and previous diagnoses and the birth weight of the child were adjusted for in regression models which estimated the association between parental diagnoses and entry into the social assistance system in the following year.

Results Families with a parent somatic diagnosis had a risk ratio of 1.4 for social assistance entry in the subsequent year of the diagnosis though substantial variation by diagnosis category was detected. Parent psychiatric diagnoses were linked to a higher, 3.01-fold risk of social assistance entry. Covariate adjustment reduced these risk ratios to 1.2 and 2.1, respectively. Some 2.9% of all social assistance entries may be attributed to parental psychiatric diagnoses while somatic health records account for another 7.2%, making their total contribution over 1/10th of all cases.

Conclusion Parental specialised healthcare records were associated with a higher risk of social assistance need. Thus more interventions to support financial management are required for parents with psychiatric diagnoses.

  • POVERTY
  • PSYCHIATRY
  • LONGITUDINAL STUDIES

Data availability statement

No data are available. Availability of the research data is subject to research permits from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and respective register holders, mandated by Finnish data protection laws and the policies of the register holders.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available. Availability of the research data is subject to research permits from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and respective register holders, mandated by Finnish data protection laws and the policies of the register holders.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @TeaLallukka

  • Contributors AH: conceptualisation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, guarantor MK-S: data curation, software, formal analysis. SR: conceptualisation, writing—review and editing. MN: conceptualisation, writing—review and editing. TL: conceptualisation, writing—review and editing. TR: supervision, conceptualisation, investigation, writing—reviewing and editing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.