Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P53 Immune-neuroendocrine patterning and response to stress. A latent profile analysis in the English longitudinal study of ageing
  1. Odessa S Hamilton1,2,3,
  2. Eleonora Iob1,4,
  3. Olesya Ajnakina3,
  4. James B Kirkbride2,
  5. Andrew Steptoe1
  1. 1Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, UK
  4. 4Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background Psychosocial stress exposure can disturb communication signals between the immune, nervous, and endocrine systems that are intended to maintain homeostasis. This dysregulation can provoke a negative feedback loop between each system that has high pathological risk. Here, we explore patterns of immune-neuroendocrine activity and the role of stress.

Methods Using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), we first identified the latent structure of immune-neuroendocrine activity (indexed by high sensitivity C-reactive protein [CRP], fibrinogen [Fb], hair cortisol [cortisol], and insulin growth-factor-1 [IGF-1]), within a population-based cohort using latent profile analysis (LPA). Then, we determined whether life stress was associated with membership of different immune-neuroendocrine profiles. We followed 4,934 male and female participants, with a median age of 65 years, over a four-year period (2008–2012).

Results A three-class LPA solution offered the most parsimonious fit to the underlying immune-neuroendocrine structure in the data, with 36 %, 40 %, and 24 % of the population belonging to profiles 1 (low-risk), 2 (moderate-risk), and 3 (high-risk), respectively. After adjustment for genetic predisposition, sociodemographics, lifestyle, and health, higher exposure to stress was associated with a 61 % greater risk of belonging to the high-risk profile (RRR: 1.61; 95 %CI = 1.23–2.12, p = 0.001), but not the moderate-risk profile (RRR = 1.10, 95 %CI = 0.89–1.35, p = 0.401), as compared with the low-risk profile four years later.

Conclusion Our findings extend existing knowledge on psychoneuroimmunological processes, by revealing how inflammation and neuroendocrine activity cluster in a representative sample of older adults, and how stress exposure was associated with immune-neuroendocrine responses over time.

  • Stress
  • Inflammation
  • Immune
  • Neuroendocrine activity
  • Longitudinal
  • Latent Profile analysis.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.