Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Estimated effect of age of marriage on utilisation of India’s Integrated Child Development Service programme
  1. Rajesh Kumar Rai1,2,3,
  2. Sabri Bromage2,4
  1. 1 Society for Health and Demographic Surveillance, Suri, West Bengal, India
  2. 2 Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  3. 3 Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4 Department of Nutrition, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rajesh Kumar Rai, Society for Health and Demographic Surveillance, Suri, West Bengal 731101, India; rajesh.iips28{at}gmail.com; Dr Sabri Bromage; sabri.bro{at}mahidol.ac.th

Abstract

Background Age of marriage among women is considered an important indicator of their readiness for familial integration and parenting. This study estimated the effect of age of marriage of young mothers (aged 15–24 years) on utilisation of various services for their children, provided under the Integrated Child Development Service (ICDS) programme in India.

Methods Data from the nationally representative 2019–2021 National Family Health Survey of India were analysed. Mothers’ age of menarche was used as an instrumental variable to isolate the effect of age of marriage on whether their children received (1) food, (2) health check-up, (3) immunisation, (4) early childhood care or preschooling or (5) weight measurement services from ICDS.

Results Nationally, 67.9% (95% CI 67.6%, 68.3%) of children received food (sample: 60 578), 61.8% (95% CI 61.4%, 62.1%) received a health check-up (sample: 60 316), 60.0% (95% CI 59.6%, 60.4%) received immunisation services (sample: 60 537), 52.0% (95% CI 51.6%, 52.4%) received early childhood care or preschooling (sample: 60 458) and 62.9% (95% CI 62.5%, 63.3%) received weight measurement services (sample: 60 278). Findings from instrumental variable analysis suggest that a 1-year increase in age of marriage could yield a 9 percentage point increase (95% CI 4%–13%; p<0.001) in utilisation of immunisation services. Although postponement of marriage positively affected utilisation of each of the other four ICDS components, these effects were not statistically significant.

Conclusion Postponing age of marriage among young women is an effective intervention for promoting uptake of child immunisation services. Our findings support the Government of India’s 2021 Bill to raise legal age of marriage of women.

  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT
  • HEALTH POLICY
  • CHILD HEALTH

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The 2019–2021 National Family Health Survey dataset used for this study could be accessed from the official website of DHS Program: https://dhsprogram.com/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The 2019–2021 National Family Health Survey dataset used for this study could be accessed from the official website of DHS Program: https://dhsprogram.com/

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Presented at This research paper was presented at the 15th International Health Economics Association (IHEA) World Congress held in Cape Town, South Africa, 8–12 July 2023.

  • Contributors RKR conceived the study design, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. SB critically revised the manuscript. RKR and SB directly accessed and verified the underlying data reported in the manuscript. All authors confirm that they have full access to all data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication. RKR is the guarantor for the study.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.