Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P113 ‘It’s like somebody does give a shit’ – the relational effects of the emergency response to local needs during the pandemic in Gateshead
  1. Tamara Mulherin1,
  2. Christine Cooper1,
  3. Monique L’hussier1,
  4. Rob Wilson2
  1. 1Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
  2. 2Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK

Abstract

Background The pandemic provides us with a teachable moment – inequalities were exacerbated and now comes the time to understand what transpired in the approaches deployed in crisis, and the implications for a ‘new normal’ in public and community welfare services arrangements . Much of the research literature on community hub interventions focusses on certain topics, such as food; social prescribing; or population subgroups such as older people. Effects have been evaluated on individual diet and BMI outcomes but not on their place in, and impact on, the broader welfare ecosystem.

In Gateshead, redeployed local authority, voluntary sector staff, and community volunteers organised emergency relief supported by a central food distribution site and a virtual call centre. As the pandemic unfolded, the emergency response evolved into responding to broader welfare needs.

Methods This paper will present on findings of a study of emergency relief hubs which operated from March 2020 – March 2022. The aim was to maximise learning from the pandemic and co-create knowledge to shape locally sensitive and sustainable service redevelopment, informed by key concepts of co-production and Human Learning Systems (French, Hesselgreaves et al. 2023). It combines semi-structured resident interviews (n=19); observations of community centres where hubs operated (n= 32 hours); a co-led resident’s workshop (n=3 hours, 12 participants) and four practitioner workshops (n= 45 participants).

Results Our early findings are divided into resident and practitioner perspectives. In relation to practitioners, indicative themes highlighted the particularities of hyper-local implementation modalities; absence of infrastructure; blurred boundaries between roles in flattened authorising environments; the challenges navigating residents complex lives; and anxieties around their post-pandemic capabilities.

Residents uniformly viewed hubs as positive and supportive, centred on responsiveness in terms of timeliness, fairness, and care - creating ‘breathing space’ during tough times; that little things mattered, e.g., asking how are you?, adding treats into food parcels for children, and support with navigating services. Nonetheless, the diverse ways residents accessed the hub was effected by low levels of awareness of their existence. And for some, stigma associated with asking for help impacted when they sought assistance.

Conclusion We consider what might be learnt about locality-based action, the interdependencies that emerged under extreme conditions, and how the experiences of those involved has lessons for local authorities facing significant inequalities, further exacerbated by the cost-of-living crisis.

  • Pandemic emergency response
  • Locality approach
  • Learning

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.