Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Injured worker outcomes after compensation system overhaul: an interrupted time series study
  1. Tyler J Lane,
  2. Michael F Di Donato,
  3. Alex Collie
  1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tyler J Lane, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; tyler.lane{at}monash.edu

Abstract

Objective In 2015, South Australia replaced its workers’ compensation system with the aim of improving return to work rates. We examined whether this was achieved by focusing on the duration of time off work, as well as claim processing times and claim volumes to understand how this may have been achieved.

Methods The primary outcome was mean weeks of compensated disability duration. Secondary outcomes tested alternative mechanisms of a change in disability duration: (1) mean employer report and insurer decision times to evaluate whether there had been changes in claim processing and (2) claim volumes to determine whether the new system altered the cohort under investigation. Outcomes were aggregated into monthly units and analysed with an interrupted time series design. Three condition subgroups—injury, disease and mental health—were compared in separate analyses.

Results While disability duration steadily declined before the RTW Act came into effect, afterwards it flatlined. A similar effect was observed in insurer decision time. Claim volumes gradually increased. Employer report time gradually decreased. Condition subgroups mostly followed a similar pattern to overall claims, though the increase in insurer decision time appears largely driven by changes in injury claims.

Conclusions The increase in disability duration after the RTW Act took effect may be attributable to an increase in insurer decision time, which itself could be due to the disruption of overhauling a compensation system or the elimination of provisional liability entitlements that incentivised early decision making and provided early intervention.

  • OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
  • HEALTH POLICY
  • WOUNDS AND INJURIES
  • MENTAL HEALTH

Data availability statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data and R code files are available on a public repository (https://doi.org/10.26180/21625778.v3). Note, this does not include individual-level claims data, which are derived from the National Data Set for Compensation-based Statistics (https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/national-dataset-compensation-based-statistics-3rd-edition-revision-1), only aggregated data. We have also provided cleaning code demonstrating how aggregated data were generated.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data and R code files are available on a public repository (https://doi.org/10.26180/21625778.v3). Note, this does not include individual-level claims data, which are derived from the National Data Set for Compensation-based Statistics (https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/national-dataset-compensation-based-statistics-3rd-edition-revision-1), only aggregated data. We have also provided cleaning code demonstrating how aggregated data were generated.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @DrTLane

  • Contributors The study was conceived by TJL and AC. TJL conducted analyses and led writing with support from AC and MFDD. As guarantor, TJL is responsible for the overall content of this work.

  • Funding This study was funded by Australian Research Council (DP190102473); Safe Work Australia (NA).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.