Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Life course partnership history and objectively measured physical functional ability in Danish middle-aged adults
  1. Simon Carstensen Nersesjan1,
  2. Charlotte Juul Nilsson1,
  3. Karolina Davidsen1,2,
  4. Margit Kriegbaum2,
  5. Rikke Lund1,2,3
  1. 1 Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  2. 2 Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  3. 3 University of Copenhagen Center for Healthy Aging, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Rikke Lund, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn 1165, Denmark; rilu{at}sund.ku.dk

Abstract

Background Partnership break-up and living alone is associated with several negative health-related outcomes. Little is known about the association with physical functional ability in a life course perspective. The aim of this study is to investigate (1) the association between number of partnership break-ups and years living alone across 26 years of adult life respectively and objectively measured physical capability in midlife, (2) how the joint exposure of accumulated break-ups or years living alone respectively, and education relates to physical capability in midlife and (3) potential gender differences.

Methods Longitudinal study of 5001 Danes aged 48–62. Accumulated number of partnership break-ups and years living alone were retrieved from national registers. Handgrip strength (HGS) and number of chair rises (CR) were recorded as outcomes in multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors, early major life events and personality.

Results Increasing number of years living alone was associated with poorer HGS and fewer CR. Concomitant exposure to short educational level and break-ups or long duration of time living alone respectively was associated with poorer physical capability compared with the groups with long educational level and no break-ups or few years lived alone.

Conclusion Accumulated number of years living alone but not break-ups was associated with poorer physical functional ability. Joint exposure to a high number of years lived alone or break-ups respectively and having a short education was associated with the lowest levels of functional ability, which points towards an important target group for interventions. No gender differences were suggested.

  • AGING
  • HEALTH
  • LONGITUDINAL STUDIES
  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • SOCIAL CLASS

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available to researchers after application to the steering group of CAMB.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available to researchers after application to the steering group of CAMB.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors Contributors RL and SCN generated the idea for the paper, and RL, SCN and MK generated an analytical plan and conducted all analyses. SCN and RL drafted the introduction, methods, results and discussion sections. CJN and KD contributed to critical revision of the design and statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results of the paper and approved the final version. RL is guarantor of overall content.

  • Funding The research leading to these results was carried out as part of the Social Inequalities in Ageing (SIA) project, funded by NordForsk, Project No. 74637. The Copenhagen Ageing and Midlife Biobank has been supported by a generous grant from the VELUX FOUNDATIONS (VELUX26145 and 31539).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.