Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P26 Socioeconomic and gendered inequities in travel behaviour in Africa: mixed-method systematic review and meta-ethnography
  1. Louise Foley1,
  2. Anna Brugulat-Panés1,
  3. James Woodcock1,
  4. Ishtar Govia2,
  5. Ian Hambleton3,
  6. Eleanor Turner-Moss1,
  7. Ebele Mogo1,
  8. Alice Charity Awinja4,
  9. Philip Dambisya5,
  10. Sostina Spiwe Matina6
  1. 1MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2Caribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
  3. 3George Alleyne Chronic Disease Research Centre, The University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
  4. 4Adaptive Management Research Consultancy, Kisumu, Kenya
  5. 5Health Policy and Systems Divisio, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  6. 6SAMRC-Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  7. 7DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  8. 8SAMRC Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science – PRICELESS SA, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  9. 9Health of Populations in Transition (HoPiT) Research Group, The University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  10. 10School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK


Background Travel has individual, societal and planetary health implications. We explored socioeconomic and gendered differences in travel behaviour in Africa, to develop an understanding of travel-related inequity.

Methods We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42019124802). In 2019, we searched MEDLINE, TRID, SCOPUS, Web of Science, LILACS, SciELO, Global Health, Africa Index Medicus, CINAHL and MediCarib for studies examining travel behaviour by socioeconomic status and gender in Africa. We appraised study quality using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. We synthesised qualitative data using meta-ethnography, followed by a narrative synthesis of quantitative data, and integrated qualitative and quantitative strands using pattern matching principles. The review was conducted through a global public health research network ( In this project, we aspired to forge equitable partnerships though the provision of bespoke systematic review training to junior team members; multiple rounds of co-interpretation of findings and co-production of their meaning; and transparent and inclusive authorship opportunities.

Results We retrieved 103 studies (20 qualitative, 24 mixed-methods, 59 quantitative). From the meta-ethnography, we observed that travel is: intertwined with social mobility; necessary to access resources; associated with cost and safety barriers; typified by long distances and slow modes; and dictated by gendered social expectations. We also observed that: motorised transport is needed in cities; walking is an unsafe, ‘captive’ mode; and urban and transport planning are uncoordinated. From these observations, we derived hypothesised patterns that were tested using the quantitative data, and found support for these overall. In lower socioeconomic individuals, travel inequity entailed reliance on walking and paratransit (informal public transport), being unable to afford travel, travelling less overall, and travelling long distances in hazardous conditions. In women and girls, travel inequity entailed reliance on walking and lack of access to private vehicles, risk of personal violence, societally-imposed travel constraints, and household duties shaping travel. Limitations included lack of analytical rigour in qualitative studies and a preponderance of cross-sectional quantitative studies (offering a static view of an evolving process).

Discussion Overall, we found that travel inequity in Africa perpetuates socioeconomic and gendered disadvantage. Proposed solutions focus on improving the safety, efficiency and affordability of public transport and walking. Through the conduct of this systematic review, we reflect on the strengths and challenges of collaborative research in the global health arena.

  • travel
  • equity
  • Africa

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.