Article Text

Download PDFPDF
OP95 Healthcare professionals’ experiences of using remote consulting for ‘care and support planning’ during COVID-19 – a qualitative study (the Casper study)
  1. Sharon McCann1,
  2. Vikki Entwistle1,
  3. Lindsay Oliver2,
  4. Nicholas Lewis-Barned2,
  5. Becky Haines3,
  6. Alan Cribb4
  1. 1Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  2. 2Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, UK
  3. 3Glenpark Medical Centre, NHS Newcastle, Gateshead, UK
  4. 4School of Education, Communication and Society, King’s College London, London, UK


Background The widespread shift to remote healthcare consulting prompted by Covid-19 is stimulating much-needed research into remote consulting practices and outcomes. Recognising that the challenges and implications vary across consultation types, we are focusing on the use of telephone consulting for ‘Care and Support Planning’ (CSP) consultations for people with long term conditions (LTCs). CSP consultations are distinctively designed to ensure healthcare professionals and patients work collaboratively to plan actions oriented to patients’ priorities.

Our study aims to understand healthcare professionals’ perspectives on conducting CSP consultations by telephone, and to investigate how and to what extent the core purposes of CSP can be achieved.

Methods In-depth, semi structured interviews with primary care professionals in England and Scotland, exploring how remote CSP consulting works in practice. Interviews are audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results Preliminary analysis of the first 11 interviews highlights that the use of telephone consultations and the settings in which patients receive their calls, can impinge on aspects of CSP consultations and hinder fulfilment of their purpose. For example, in telephone consultations, it is harder to ‘look together’ at patients’ test results, the absence of visual cues can make recognition of emotions and interpretation of silences difficult, and the establishment of rapport can seem harder, especially when the patient and health professional have not met before. Health professionals also expressed concerns about the inability to ‘eyeball’ patients when not seeing them in-person, limiting their scope to identify any potential concerns. There were also common challenges with patients joining consultations from situations in which they lacked privacy, had not read their test results or ‘not in the right headspace’ to discuss their concerns and ideas. In these circumstances, health professionals worry that, especially for patients with more complex needs, the benefits of the CSP structure can feel lost as conversations tend to ‘drift’ into a chat, or revert to professionally directed reviews. They report having developed various strategies to strengthen their spoken signalling of the structure of the CSP consultation to the patient but described how ‘draining’ this can be when they continue to experience difficulties eliciting patients’ reflections, concerns and ideas, and developing patient-led plans.

Conclusion This study is identifying both issues of concern and strategies to help ensure CSP is delivered as well as possible remotely. The challenges of achieving ‘equivalence’ to in-person consultations should not be neglected with moves towards more ‘hybrid’ approaches to healthcare consulting.

  • person centred care
  • remote consulting
  • long term conditions

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.