Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P61 Regional inequalities in multimorbidity within England between 2004 and 2019: a descriptive epidemiology study using the clinical practice research datalink
  1. Anna Head,
  2. Kate Fleming,
  3. Chris Kypridemos,
  4. Pietà Schofield,
  5. Martin O’Flaherty
  1. Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK


Background An estimated 25% of GP patients within the UK have multimorbidity (two or more chronic conditions), a large proportion of which is attributable to non-communicable diseases, many of them preventable. There are known regional inequalities in health across England, including for chronic diseases. This study aimed to describe regional inequalities in multimorbidity incidence and prevalence.

Methods We selected a random sample of 1m adults from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD Aurum database) registered at participating GP practices within England between 2004 and 2019. Regions were defined by 2010 Strategic Health Authority boundaries as per the location of the participant’s general practice. Participants were linked to quintiles of the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) as a measure of area-level socioeconomic deprivation. We used two measures of multimorbidity: a) basic multimorbidity: two or more chronic conditions; b) complex multimorbidity: at least three chronic conditions affecting at least three body systems. A list of 211 chronic conditions of interest, including long-term mental health conditions and chronic infections, was agreed by a multidisciplinary team. Using standard formulae, we calculated crude and age-sex standardised multimorbidity prevalence and incidence by geographical region. We used quasi-Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios adjusted for year, sex, age, region, and IMD quintile. Analyses were conducted using R v4.0.4.

Results Our final sample consisted of 989,421 adults: 48.7% male, with median age of 46 years (inter-quartile range 33–62). The overall crude prevalence of multimorbidity in England was 43.7% for basic, and 25.2% for complex multimorbidity over the 16-year study period. London had the lowest crude prevalence of both multimorbidity types (basic: 35.4%; complex: 18.3%), whilst the North East had the highest (basic: 48.6%; complex: 29.6%). In age-sex standardised results, prevalence was still highest in the North East, with London and the South East having the lowest prevalence. Similar regional inequalities were found in the incidence of both multimorbidity types. Compared to London, the North East had higher multimorbidity prevalence in risk ratios adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation and demographic factors (basic multimorbidity: 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.16, 1.19); complex multimorbidity: 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.24, 1.29).

Conclusion There are regional inequalities in multimorbidity within England with higher burden in the North, compared to London and the South. These inequalities remained after adjusting for age and socioeconomic deprivation. Strategies aimed at addressing the social determinants of health are needed to reduce future burden on health and social care systems, particularly in the North of England.

  • multimorbidity
  • regional
  • inequalities

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.