You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

PostScript
Letter
Flattening the curve of new publications on COVID-19
Free
  1. Alexandre Balaphas1,
  2. Kyriaki Gkoufa2,
  3. Marie-Josée Daly3,
  4. Timothée de Valence3
  1. 1 Division of Digestive Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
  2. 2 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Patient Education, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
  3. 3 Division of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Alexandre Balaphas, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; alexandre.balaphas{at}unige.ch

https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214617

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    In order to respond to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic, all fields of medical and biological sciences are working to improve the understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this race against time, studies are expeditiously conducted and journal review and acceptance processes accelerated. Although this approach dramatically reduced the time required to publish, could the quality of these new studies be affected? Indeed, reducing the review time may allow for errors or biases to be missed, jeopardising the validity of evidence-based medicine principles. Abundance of information can also be confusing for healthcare practitioners and governments.1 Moreover, redundancy in COVID-19 trials could lead to lost time and energy for research teams, scientific journals and reviewers.2

    In order to explore this phenomenon, we used the Medline database …

    View Full Text