Article Text

Download PDFPDF

OP60 Diffusion of the ASSIST smoking prevention programme in adolescent social networks beyond the school setting
Free
  1. F Dobbie1,
  2. L Bauld1,
  3. A Amos2,
  4. S Haw1
  1. 1Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
  2. 2Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Background Smoking prevention programmes that aim to reach adolescents before they start to experiment with tobacco may contribute to reducing tobacco use. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial) is a peer- led, school and social network based, smoking prevention programme that encourages the dissemination of non-smoking messages among 12–13 year olds in the UK. To date, evaluation of ASSIST has focused on delivery within schools only. This study sought to address this gap by using qualitative social network research to map the social networks of peer supporters to explore the extent, nature, content and perceived impact of message diffusion beyond the school year.

Methods Qualitative, face to face interviews conducted in school with 16 young people aged 12–13 incorporating the creation of ‘egocentric sociograms’ to collect network data. Sociograms were then used to create a qualitative narrative to explore the extent, and perceived impact, of message diffusion in the wider social networks of peer supporters. Computer packages UCINET and NVivo were used to conduct analysis.

Results Peer supporter networks were fairly large with a total of 155 people. Network composition was weighted slightly more toward family members than friends. Peer supporters recalled having conversations about smoking with 103 people. Over half (53% n=55) of these conversations were with people out with their school year (e.g. parents, siblings, other family members, family friends and neighbours). Thematic analysis of conversation content revealed three types of conversation: protecting non-smokers from starting to smoke; encouraging smokers to stop; and protecting people in wider social networks. Perceived impact was noted for 37 people in peer supporter networks, with examples of positive and negative impact, focusing on the dynamics of a child speaking to an adult.

Conclusion Smoking prevention message diffusion was not limited to school year, reaching in to the wider networks of peer supporters. This creates learning opportunities for the future delivery of ASSIST or other similar peer-led interventions for smoking prevention, and the role of social network interventions in prevention.

  • Qualitative social network analysis
  • smoking prevention
  • peer intervention

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.