Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P36 Loneliness, social isolation and health: ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ in the United Kingdom?
  1. NK Valtorta1,
  2. B Hanratty2
  1. 1Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
  2. 2Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK


Background Loneliness, understood as the negative feeling experienced by those who perceive their social relationships to be deficient, and social isolation, characterised by the relative absence of contact with others, have recently been identified as a public health challenge in the United Kingdom. How is this social «problem» defined, who is expected to tackle it, and how? These are the questions we explore in our presentation.

Methods We used Bacchi’s (2009) ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ framework, informed by Foucault's theory of governmentality and methods of problematization, archaeology and genealogy, to analyse the way in which the issue of loneliness and social isolation is represented in British policy. Taking the 2012 White Paper «Caring for our Future: Reforming care and support» as our starting point, we used discourse analysis to identify the assumptions of the public health strategy currently being promoted.

Results We identified three main assumptions: 1) being lonely or socially isolated is perceived to be particularly problematic in older age; 2) loneliness and social isolation are targeted as factors whose potential effects on health can be modified; 3) the involvement of civil society is identified as key to the delivery of interventions aimed at strengthening the social relationships of isolated individuals. We show how these assumptions shape the prevention strategies currently promoted, and what they omit. In particular, we discuss how the current focus on secondary and tertiary prevention ignores important dynamics such as lifecourse trajectories and social determinants of health.

Conclusion Actively questioning the representation of the «problem» of loneliness and social isolation in British policy allows us to shed light on the limitations of the intervention approach currently pursued. In particular, it highlights the absence of primary intervention initiatives, which are key to an effect prevention strategy.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.