Background An association between lower IQ of parents, measured early in life, and smoking among their offspring has been reported. The extent to which other background factors account for this association is unknown.
Methods Data on IQ, smoking, mental health, social class, parental divorce and social problems in a cohort of men born during 1949–1951 and conscripted for military service in 1969 were linked to smoking data on 682 offspring interviewed in the Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions 1984–2009.
Results In an age-adjusted model, a one-step decrease on a stanine scale was associated with an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.35) for offspring smoking. Adjusting for father's socioeconomic background and smoking, mental illness and social problems in youth only marginally lowered the OR's.
Conclusions Lower IQ among fathers measured at ages 18–20 years was associated with smoking in their offspring. The association was not explained by father's social class in childhood or a higher prevalence of mental illness, social problems or smoking measured among the fathers in their late adolescence.
- Cohort studies
- Social and life-course epidemiology
- PUBLIC HEALTH
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Smoking is one of the highest-ranked contributors to the global burden of disease and mortality.1 It typically starts in adolescence and often continues into adulthood.2 Previous research has found inverse associations of general intelligence, measured in youth, with smoking and other adverse health behaviours,4–6 and also with morbidity and mortality across the life course.3 ,6 ,7 The associations are typically not explained by socioeconomic and social conditions during the upbringing, but education and socioeconomic conditions in adulthood seem to be more important.3–5 ,7 It has also been suggested that lower intelligence may result in poorer understanding of health consequences and thereby, increases the risk of smoking.6
Parental characteristics can directly or indirectly affect many of the circumstances associated with children's smoking later in life. Several studies have reported that social and psychosocial conditions in the parental home are associated with smoking among children.8–10 For example, adverse childhood experiences, such as parental divorce11 ,12 or having a mentally-ill household member,11 have been related to an increased risk of smoking in adulthood. Parenting style and parents’ attitudes can also have an influence on smoking behaviour in adolescent and adult offspring.13–15 In an even longer perspective, results from an Australian study16 indicate that smoking behaviour can have intergenerational implications. In this study, an association was found between the occupational status of grandparents before the birth of a grandchild and the prevalence of smoking among grandchildren at age 14 years. The association remained unaffected by adjustments for income in the grandchild's’ family.16
Parental intelligence has also been found to be associated with smoking in their offspring. Hart et al17 found that, in a cohort of 179 Scottish men and women and their offspring, childhood IQ of the parents was associated with the amount of smoking among their offspring. The association remained unaffected by adjustment for parental social class and category of deprivation, but there was no control for other parental characteristics. In a larger British cohort, including 2202 parents and their offspring, an association of parental IQ with emotional and attention problems in their children at the age of about 7 years was partly accounted for by cognitive and emotional support from parents and maternal psychological distress.18 It is also possible that parental characteristics mediate the association between parental IQ and offspring smoking. Since socioeconomic circumstances in grandparents have been found to predict smoking in grandchildren, it is also possible that socioeconomic and social factors in the grandparental generation act as confounders in the association. Further, there is a lack of large studies of associations between parental intelligence and offspring health behaviours in adolescence and adulthood, when the offspring make their own independent health decisions.
For the present investigation, we took advantage of the availability of data on IQ, and social and psychosocial factors at age 18–20 years among men in the Swedish 1969 conscription cohort, born 1949–1951, and on the smoking behaviour of a subset of 749 of their offspring, born 1968–1993, who were randomly sampled and interviewed in the Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions during the years 1984–2009. Using these data, we investigated whether fathers’ IQ, measured in late adolescence, is associated with smoking among their children, and the extent to which any association is explained by other social and psychosocial factors among the fathers.
The study was based on data from a nation-wide survey of 49 321 young Swedish males of ages 18–20 years, who were conscripted for compulsory military service in 1969 and 1970, and subsequently followed as a cohort by linkage to national registers and other data. The background of the Swedish conscription surveys and the variables included have been presented in detail elsewhere.19 ,20 Only 2–3% of all Swedish men were exempted from conscription at this time; in most cases, due to severe handicaps or congenital disorders. Ninety-eight per cent of all men conscripted in 1969 and 1970 were born in 1949–1951, while the remaining 2% were born before 1949. Of these men, 39 095 had a total of 91 018 children born during 1968–2004. The Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions have been conducted by Statistics Sweden annually since 1975, using a national random sample of the population aged 16–84 years. Samples varying from 7000 to 10 000 persons have been interviewed every year, each in a 1 h private session, and the response rates have been around 80% or more. Of the 91 018 children, 72 728 were in at least one of the sample frames of the Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions 1984–2009, that is, were 16 years or older at the time of sampling. Among the children, 749 were sampled and subsequently interviewed (10% of the 72 728 individuals). This subset of children (linked by unique individual identifiers to information on fathers, mothers and grandfather through the Multigenerational Register at Statistics Sweden) makes up the study population in the present investigation.
Information on IQ and other variables concerning the fathers in the conscription survey of 1969
The IQ tests, which have been described elsewhere,21 ,22 included subtests of logic/general intelligence; verbal test of synonym detection; of visuospatial/geometric perception; and of technical/mechanical skills with mathematical/physics problems. Correlations between the subtests ranged from 0.50 to 0.75. The outcome of each subtest was ranked 1–9 according to a standard-nine scale, and then transformed into a new stanine scale (mean=5, SD=2) as a measure of general ability. This measure was used to estimate the conscript's ability to profit from education and finding the right level of learning demands in military training, and corresponds to approximate IQ bands of: <74, 74–81, 82–89, 90–95, 96–104, 105–110, 111–118, 119–126, >126.21
The conscripts were also asked to complete questionnaires concerning social background, behaviour and social adjustment, and substance use, for example, cigarette smoking, and drug and alcohol consumption. Cigarette smoking was classified into one of three levels (non-smokers, 1–10 cigarettes/day, >10 cigarettes/day). Only current smoking was included in the questionnaire. A composite variable, ‘risky use of alcohol’, was created from affirmative answers to one or more of the following questions: consumption of >250 g 100% alcohol/week, ever drinking alcohol as an ‘eye-opener’ during a hangover, ever having been apprehended for drunkenness, or having ‘often’ been drunk (other choices were ‘rather often’, ‘sometimes’, and ‘never’). This variable has been found to predict alcohol-related disorders and disability pension in adulthood.23 ,24 Questionnaire information was also obtained on parental divorce and whether the conscript had ever been in contact with police or child welfare authorities (at least once), and was used as indicators of conflicts among family members and social or behavioural problems, respectively. These variables have, in various degrees, been associated with negative outcomes later in life in this cohort19 ,23 ,25–29 and might be indicators of adverse circumstances in the offsprings’ home environment.
All conscripts also went through a medical examination and were interviewed by a psychologist. Those reporting or presenting psychiatric symptoms or disorders were referred to a psychiatrist, and any mental disorder was diagnosed according to the Swedish version of the 8th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8). About 12% of the conscripts were given a psychiatric diagnosis.30
Socioeconomic position in the conscripts’ childhood was taken from occupation of conscript's parents as registered in the Swedish National Population and Housing Census 1960, and classified into four groups: unskilled manual workers, skilled manual workers, non-manual workers and farmers, and those not possible to classify. Education levels of the conscripts and the mothers of offspring were taken from the Swedish National Population and Housing Census 1990, and classified as less or more than 12 years of education (upper secondary).
Follow-up data on smoking
The 749 children were interviewed in at least one annual Survey of Living Conditions, randomly distributed between 1984 and 2009 and depending solely on the chance occurrence of their inclusion in a particular annual Survey of Living Conditions sample. In these surveys, respondents were asked if they were currently smokers or non-smokers. No information on the number of cigarettes smoked was available in these surveys.
The representativeness of the sample of offspring 16 years or older (n=682 with information on all variables) was evaluated by comparing the prevalence of covariates with those of the total conscript cohort with offspring 16 years or older in 2009 (N=38 564).
The association between paternal IQ and offspring smoking was assessed using logistic regression models to estimate ORs with 95% CIs in multivariate models. Paternal IQ was modelled as a continuous variable, with OR's given for each one-step decrease on the stanine scale. Additional analyses were also performed in which paternal IQ was classified into three groups where low IQ corresponds to scoring 1–3; middle IQ refers to scoring 4–6 and high IQ refers to scoring 7–9 on the stanine scale. This corresponds approximately to score <90, 90–110 and >110 on the traditional IQ scale.21 An interaction analysis was performed to test for interaction with offspring sex. The logistic regression analyses are based on those 682 participants in the subset with complete data on all included variables. All analyses were adjusted for age and year of interview.
Comparison of covariates with regard to their prevalence between the subsample (offspring interviewed in the Surveys of Living Conditions 1984–2009) and the full cohort (conscripts’ offspring aged 16 years and older during 1984–2009), showed good agreement (table 1). This would be expected if the sampling for the Surveys of Living Conditions was truly random, and if there was no important refusal bias.
Table 2 shows characteristics of the offspring in the sample. Among the 682 offspring included in the analyses, 70 reported being smokers: 46 female and 24 male.
Table 3 shows the associations of fathers’ characteristics and mothers’ educational level with their offspring's smoking. Among these factors, fathers’ contact with police or childcare authorities, psychiatric diagnosis and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day at conscription, and father only having upper-secondary education were the strongest predictors. These factors were associated with about a doubled risk of smoking among the offspring compared with having a father with no previous contact with police or childcare authorities, no psychiatric diagnosis, who did not smoke, and had a higher educational level, respectively.
Table 4 shows the associations of father's IQ with offspring smoking, in basic and adjusted models. A one-step decrease on the stanine scale, corresponding to half a standard-deviation, was associated with an increased OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.53). Adjusting for father's educational level, and to a slightly lesser extent the mother's educational level, attenuated the association somewhat, while other factors had no or marginal effects on the association. In the analyses using three categories of fathers’ IQ, the OR's and 95% CI's for offspring smoking during follow-up were (with high IQ as reference): medium IQ 1.61 (0.84 to 3.09) and low IQ 3.26 (1.57 to 6.78) in the basic model; and medium IQ 1.39 (0.69 to 2.79) and low IQ 2.91 (1.26 to 6.72) in the fully adjusted model. There was no interaction between father's IQ and sex of offspring (p=0.89).
In this longitudinal study, we found that IQ of the father was strongly associated with their offspring's smoking. Several other characteristics of the fathers that were also associated with offspring smoking, such as socioeconomic background, smoking and low mental well-being in young adulthood, and educational attainment of the fathers and the mothers of the offspring, did not explain much of the association between father's IQ and offspring smoking.
The analyses in this study were based on a small sample of the full cohort with follow-up smoking data. This was the result of a chance intersection of the cohort with the respondents to an entirely separate series of stratified random national surveys, namely the Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions. The relatively small sample, however, was representative of the full cohort with regard to information concerning the father. The prospective nature of the study enhanced the validity of its findings. Information on the fathers was gathered in most cases before the offspring was born and long before the establishment of lifestyle behaviours.
Smoking data among the offspring were collected between 1984 and 2009, at a time when the dangers of smoking were well publicised. It is possible, therefore, that some respondents to the follow-up surveys claimed to be non-smokers despite actually being smokers. If this was more common among the offspring of men with higher IQ, our estimates would be overestimated. Moreover, our definition of smoking during follow-up was limited by being based on only one time point and on self-reported smoking status, as a smoker or non-smoker. Thus, although we find it unlikely, there may have been a spurious association between father's IQ and offspring smoking if there was an association between father's IQ and the point in time when the offspring was sampled for the survey. We did not have information on offspring or maternal IQ. Considering that the data on parental characteristics in this study had only a marginal effect on the association between father's IQ and offspring smoking, such information would most likely be helpful in furthering understanding of the mechanisms underlying the association.
These results are in line with Hart et al's17 finding of an association between parental IQ and offspring smoking in a cohort of 179 parents and their offspring. Some recent, larger studies also found that paternal IQ was associated with other health-related outcomes in their children, such as lower risk of injuries31 ,32 and fewer hours of TV watching,32 which further indicates that parents’ IQ can indeed have health consequences for their offspring in various ways.
In the study by Hart et al,17 parental social class in adulthood did not explain the association between parental IQ and offspring smoking. In the present study, using data from father's childhood and adolescence, adjusting for father's childhood social class and other background variables did not affect the association with offspring smoking. By contrast, intragenerational associations between IQ and one's own smoking has been shown to attenuate33 ,34 or even be reversed35 after adjusting for various background variables.
Father's education had a small attenuating effect on the association, which might reflect the education of the father having a real effect on offspring smoking, even if this happens indirectly via, for example, social factors over and above the association between father's IQ and offspring smoking. On the other hand, the role of education in explaining the associations between IQ and various outcomes is difficult to interpret since intelligence and education are strongly correlated and affect each other.36 It has been argued that education, in some sense, is a proxy for intelligence; thus, adjusting for education in analyses of associations between intelligence and outcomes might be an overadjustment.5
It has been suggested that mother's educational level is more important than father's education for offspring health.37 Given that IQ is strongly related to educational attainment.36 it is possible that assortative mating, the tendency to choose a mate with a similar genotype to oneself, accounts for some part of the association between father's IQ and offspring smoking. We had no information on mother's IQ, which would have been useful. However, if mother's IQ was an important factor in the association, it would have been expected that adjusting for mother's education would have had a relatively large attenuating effect on the estimate; instead, we found that it had less impact than father's education in our analyses.
It has been suggested that the association between intelligence and health is partly explained by more intelligent people being better able to make healthy choices and maintain a healthy lifestyle,6 and previous longitudinal studies have shown that IQ early in life is associated with smoking.3–5 Accordingly, it is possible that offspring's own IQ, a trait that is highly heritable,38 mediated some of the association such that offspring with higher IQ were less likely to smoke. We had no data on offspring's IQ and could not investigate this possible pathway. In previous studies of associations of parents’ IQ with health behaviours, such as hours spent watching TV by their children at age around 8 years, adjusting for the child's own IQ had little or no effect on the associations.32 In the present study, however, the offspring were adolescents or adults at time of assessment of smoking and thus were more independent in their choices.
On the other hand, previous findings that the associations between IQ and smoking are largely explained by socioeconomic position3–5 imply that it is social positioning rather than the individual's own ability to make healthy choices that accounts for the IQ-smoking association in an intragenerational perspective. In the present study, adjustment for socioeconomic and social background had little attenuating effect on the association, but we had no data on the offspring's social circumstances in adulthood.
Another possibility is that father's IQ, which is strongly associated with psychiatric disorders in adulthood in this cohort,21 is also negatively related to psychological distress in their offspring, of which smoking might be a marker.39 Even though adjusting for father's psychiatric diagnoses in early adulthood had no effect on the association, we cannot rule out the possibility that mental disorders emerged later in life and affected the psychological well-being of their offspring. Other psychosocial factors, not captured by socioeconomic position or the other variables, might also have mediated the association. The findings of a Swedish twin study suggest that shared environmental factors account for most of the association between intelligence and smoking,34 implying that the family environment might play a role.
It has been suggested that the reason why deprived groups more often take up and persist in smoking may be linked to their generally poorer life chances and that it might be a rationale response to such circumstances.40 In accordance with the findings of other studies,16 ,41 ,42 the results of this study indicate that certain life circumstances may be linked to factors measured in the previous generation even before the participants were born.
The study shows that fathers’ IQ measured in early life is associated with offspring smoking. The association is independent of socioeconomic position, and of early signs of mental illness and smoking among fathers, but more knowledge is needed on the role of the mother's and the offspring's own IQ in this association. The findings suggest that IQ is a factor to consider in smoking prevention targeted at families.
What is already known on this subject
Early-life IQ is associated with health behaviours and longevity, independent of socioeconomic background.
Early-life IQ among parents has also been found to predict health behaviours, including smoking, in their offspring. The mechanisms are unclear.
What this study adds
In this study of 682 randomly sampled offspring of Swedish men, lower IQ among fathers was found to be stepwise associated with a higher risk of self-reported smoking in adolescence or adulthood.
Father's socioeconomic background and smoking, mental illness and social problems in youth did not fully account for the association.
Contributors AL, BM and TH conceived the study; AL performed the statistical analyses; ASW, AL and TH drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed important intellectual content and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, grant number: 2011-0960.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The Ethics Committee at the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, approved the study.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.