Download PDFPDF

How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    How stakeholder participation could increase inequities. The inverse equity hypothesis lens.
    • Ramiro Manzano, Medical Doctor
    • Other Contributors:
      • Diego Andres Gomez and Herney Andres Garcia Perdomo

    Recent review from Harris et al [1] sets the alternative hypothesis that greater degree of stakeholders participation can produce a contextually valid synthesis. Aware of the importance of stakeholders in healthcare, a null hypothesis may come to mind: Stakeholders increase inequity by biasing synthesis. Let us give you some theoretical framework. Research on public health interventions should include academic researcher...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.