You are here

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Theory and methods
How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study

Authors

  1. Correspondence to Dr Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Evaluation of Social Interventions Programme, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top Floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB, UK; vittal.katikireddi{at}glasgow.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Katikireddi SV, Egan M, Petticrew M
How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69:189-195.

Publication history

  • Received July 23, 2014
  • Revised November 15, 2014
  • Accepted November 18, 2014
  • First published December 6, 2014.
Online issue publication 
April 27, 2016

Article Versions

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/