Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
OP02 Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies
  1. R Cooper1,
  2. M Benzeval2,
  3. IJ Deary3,
  4. EM Dennison4,
  5. G Der5,
  6. CR Gale4,3,
  7. HM Inskip4,
  8. C Jagger6,
  9. TB Kirkwood6,
  10. DA Lawlor7,
  11. SM Robinson4,
  12. JM Starr3,
  13. A Steptoe8,
  14. K Tilling7,
  15. D Kuh1,
  16. C Cooper4,
  17. A Aihie Sayer4,
  18. RM Dodds4,
  19. HE Syddall4
  1. 1MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
  3. 3Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  4. 4MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  5. 5MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  6. 6Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
  7. 7School of Social and Community Medicine, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  8. 8Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK


Background Epidemiological studies have shown that weaker grip strength in later life is associated with subsequent disability, morbidity and mortality. Grip strength is a key component of the sarcopenia and frailty phenotypes and yet it is unclear how individual measurements of grip strength should be interpreted in the clinical setting. Using data from general population studies conducted in Great Britain, our objective was to produce cross-sectional centile values for grip strength across the life course.

Methods We combined data from 12 general population studies conducted in Great Britain which had measured grip strength using a range of different dynamometers and measurement protocols. We produced centile curves using the Box-Cox Cole and Green distribution. We carried out a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the impact on the centiles produced of dynamometer type and measurement position (seated or standing).

Results We combined 60,803 observations from 49,964 participants (26,687 female) to produce gender-stratified cross-sectional centile curves for grip strength from ages 4 to 90 years. The curves suggested three overall periods: an increase to peak in early adult life, maintenance through to midlife and decline from midlife onwards. Males were on average 1.7 times stronger than females from age 25 onwards: males’ peak median grip was 51kg between ages 29 and 39, compared to 31kg in females between ages 26 and 42. Sensitivity analyses suggested our findings were robust to protocol differences between studies. Weak grip strength, defined as strength at least 2.5 SDs below the gender-specific peak mean, increased sharply with age, reaching a prevalence of 23% in males and 27% in females by age 80.

Conclusion This is the first study to provide normative data for grip strength across the life course. Our data were drawn from many studies which, in keeping with clinical practice, had used a variety of different measurement protocols; sensitivity analyses suggested that our centile curves were robust to these differences. These centile values have the potential to inform the clinical assessment of grip strength which is recognised as an important part of the identification of people with sarcopenia and frailty.

  • lifecourse
  • physical function
  • normative data

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.