Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Food packaging and migration of food contact materials: will epidemiologists rise to the neotoxic challenge?
  1. Jane Muncke1,
  2. John Peterson Myers2,3,
  3. Martin Scheringer4,
  4. Miquel Porta5
  1. 1Food Packaging Forum Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
  2. 2Environmental Health Sciences, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  3. 3Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  4. 4Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  5. 5Hospital del Mar Institute of Medical Research (IMIM), School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and CIBERESP, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jane Muncke, Food Packaging Forum Foundation, Staffelstrasse 12, Zurich CH-8045, Switzerland; jane.muncke{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In the early 1990s, several groups of scientists—including epidemiologists and pneumologists—began to publish a series of prospective studies reporting an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases in people exposed to low levels of airborne particles.1 ,2 Before these publications, toxicological studies had primarily focused on pulmonary effects of particulates in laboratory animals—and the results from those studies indicated that air pollution levels in many places were too low to cause harm to humans. This created something of a paradox, seemingly: epidemiologists finding adverse effects for which the biological mechanisms were not apparent. Over the next several years, the epidemiological and clinical evidence on cardiovascular effects associated with particulates increased,2 leading to the design of toxicological and other laboratory studies aiming at understanding mechanisms for the effects. Epidemiological data challenged assumptions and furthered knowledge about the mechanisms of toxicity. And ultimately, the toxicologists began asking and answering different questions. Laboratory and population studies were enriching each other, as they should. As a result, we now have a good understanding of cardiovascular risks from particulates, and have corresponding policies and regulation to protect citizens from air pollution.3–5

Food contact materials and human health: a new challenge for epidemiological research

As ubiquitous as particulate air pollution (or more), but until recently with a much lower profile, food contact materials (FCMs) have long posed a silent challenge to researchers concerned with human health, nutrition and the environment. FCMs are articles used in packaging, food storage, processing or preparation equipment that come directly into contact with human foods. Most often FCMs are made of plastic or have a synthetic material in direct contact with the foodstuff—for example, as can coating, laminate in beverage cartons or the closures of glass jars. Importantly, most FCMs are not inert. Chemicals contained in the FCM, such as monomers, additives, processing aids or reaction by-products, can diffuse into foods. …

View Full Text


  • Contributors Idea for the article: MP. Literature search and writing the article: JM, JPM, MS, MP. Guarantors: MP, JM.

  • Funding Our work was not supported by any other funder.

  • Competing interests JM is a part-time employee of the Food Packaging Forum and has no restrictions on carrying out scientific research. MS and MP are members of the Food Packaging Forum Foundation's board, a non-profit charitable organisation based in Zurich, Switzerland. They receive no financial compensation for their board membership and duties. JPM is a member of the Food Packaging Forum Foundation's Scientific Advisory Board. He receives no financial compensation for his role on the board.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.