Background Cases of premature death in Africa may be attributed to witchcraft. In such settings, medical registration of causes of death is rare. To fill this gap, verbal autopsy (VA) methods record signs and symptoms of the deceased before death as well as lay opinion regarding the cause of death; this information is then interpreted to derive a medical cause of death. In the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, South Africa, around 6% of deaths are believed to be due to ‘bewitchment’ by VA respondents.
Methods Using 6874 deaths from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System, the epidemiology of deaths reported as bewitchment was explored, and using medical causes of death derived from VA, the association between perceptions of witchcraft and biomedical causes of death was investigated.
Results The odds of having one's death reported as being due to bewitchment is significantly higher in children and reproductive-aged women (but not in men) than in older adults. Similarly, sudden deaths or those following an acute illness, deaths occurring before 2001 and those where traditional healthcare was sought are more likely to be reported as being due to bewitchment. Compared with all other deaths, deaths due to external causes are significantly less likely to be attributed to bewitchment, while maternal deaths are significantly more likely to be.
Conclusions Understanding how societies interpret the essential factors that affect their health and how health seeking is influenced by local notions and perceived aetiologies of illness and death could better inform sustainable interventions and health promotion efforts.
- South Africa
- cause of death
- verbal autopsy
- lay perceptions
- developing countr CG
- developing countr SI
- epidemiology ME
- health beliefs SI
- mortality SI
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This work was undertaken within the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research at the Division of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, with support from FAS, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (grant no. 2006-1512). The Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System was funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK (grant nos. 058893/Z/99/A and 069683/Z/02/Z), the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, USA, and the University of the Witwatersrand and Medical Research Council, South Africa.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was part of surveillance-based activities in Agincourt, which are conducted with the approval of the Committee for Research on Human Subject (Medical) at the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.