Aim The aim of this study was to analyse whether gender inequality in the domestic sphere was associated with psychological distress among women and men.
Methods In a cohort study, all pupils in the last year of compulsory school in a middle-sized industrial town in northern Sweden were followed until the age of 42. For this study a sample of cohabiting participants (n=372 women, 352 men) was selected. Gender inequality was measured as perceptions of gender inequality in the couple relationship, time spent on household work, responsibility for domestic work and childcare, and was analysed in relation to psychological distress, after taking possible background variables as well as earlier health status into account.
Results In the multivariate analyses, perception of gender inequality in the couple relationship was associated with psychological distress for both women (OR 2.23, CI 1.20 to 4.18) and men (OR 3.51, CI 1.69 to 7.31). For women only, taking whole responsibility for domestic work was associated with the outcome (OR 2.17, CI 1.05 to 4.48). For men, taking less than half of the responsibility for domestic work was associated with psychological distress (OR 2.25, CI 1.24 to 3.91).
Conclusions Gender inequality in the domestic sphere seems to be an important determinant of psychological distress for both women and men.
- Gender inequality
- public health
- domestic work
- psychological distress
- health-related selection
- gender studies SI
- public health Europe
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Financial support was provided by the Swedish Council for Social Research, Box 2220, 103 15 Stockholm, Sweden and the National Graduate School for Gender Studies at Umeå Centre for Gender Studies, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Umeå, Sweden.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.