Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Epidemiology and policy
P1-308 Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on the long-term attitude towards breast cancer screening
  1. R Román1,
  2. M Sala1,
  3. R Zubuzarreta2,
  4. I Delfrade3,
  5. D Salas4,
  6. M D la vega5,
  7. A Baroja6,
  8. C Natal7,
  9. F Macià1,
  10. M Baré8,
  11. J Galceran9,
  12. I González-Román10,
  13. X Castells1
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM–Parc de Salut Mar, CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2Galician breast cancer screening programme, Public health & Planning Directorate, Health Office, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  3. 3Navarra Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Public Health Institute, CIBERESP, Pamplona, Spain
  4. 4General Directorate Public Health & Centre for Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
  5. 5General Directorate of Health Care Programmes, Canary Islands Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
  6. 6La Rioja Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Fundacion Rioja Salud, Logroño, Spain
  7. 7Unit of Analysis and Programs, Health Service of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
  8. 8Epidemiology and Assessment Unit UDIAT-Diagnostic Center, Corporació Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain
  9. 9PDPCM, League Foundation and Cancer Prevention Research, IISPV, Reus, Spain
  10. 10Castilla-Leon Breast Cancer Screening Programme, D.G. Salud Publica ID e I, SACYL, Valladolid, Spain


Introduction Adherence to breast cancer screening is affected by presence of previous false-positives and regular participation in previous invitations. Our aim was to estimate the long-term adherence to breast cancer screening and how false-positive and women's characteristics affect the probability of re-attending screening.

Methods Retrospective Cohort study of women aged 45–69 years invited to participate in any of 10 Spanish breast cancer screening programs between 1990 and 2006. Discrete time hazard models were used to estimate re-attendance probabilities, and to evaluate the effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on re-attendance.

Results We analysed information from 1 371 218 screened women who underwent 4 545 346 screening mammograms. The re-attendance probability was 81.7% (95% CI 81.63 to 81.76) at first screening, 88.1% (95% CI 87.98 to 88.12) at 3rd screening, and 95.6% (95% CI 95.52 to 95.73) at 6th screening. Women without a false-positive result were more likely to return to the following screening invitation. The re-attendance probability at first screening was 79.3% (99% CI 79.0–79.6) and 85.3% (99% CI 85.2–85.4) for women with and without a false-positive result, respectively. At sixth screening was 94.6% (99% CI 93.8–95.4) and 96.0% (99% CI 95.8–96.1), respectively. The factors associated with a higher risk of failing to re-attend the following screening invitation were: age 65–69 years (OR=8.48; CI 8.31–8.65), missing the first screening invitation (OR=1.12; CI 1.11–1.14), and previous invasive procedures (OR=1.09; CI 1.07–1.10).

Conclusion False-positive results and other women's characteristics affected the re-attendance to subsequent screening invitations. This information could be useful to provide the maximum available information to women invited to participate and improve compliance in subsequent screening invitations.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.