Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Inequalities in immunisation and breast feeding in an ethnically diverse urban area: cross-sectional study in Manchester, UK
  1. Deborah Baker,
  2. Adam Garrow,
  3. Christopher Shiels
  1. Centre for Social Justice Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Adam Garrow, Centre for Social Justice Research, University of Salford, 5th Floor Allerton Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford M6 6PU, UK; a.garrow{at}salford.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To examine inequalities in immunisation and breast feeding by ethnic group and their relation to relative deprivation.

Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting Manchester, UK.

Participants 20 203 children born in Manchester (2002–2007), who had been coded as of white, mixed, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and black or black British ethnicity in the Child Health System database.

Main outcome measures Breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum; uptake of triple vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) at 16 weeks post partum; uptake of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) by the age of 2.

Results Black or black British infants had the highest rates of breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum (89%), and South Asian infants had the highest triple and MMR vaccination rates (Indian, 95%, 96%; Pakistani 95%, 95%; Bangladeshi 96%, 95%) after area level of deprivation, parity, parenthood status and age had been controlled for. White infants were least likely to be breast fed at 2 weeks post partum (36%), and to be vaccinated with triple (92%) and MMR vaccines (88%). Within the white ethnic group, lower percentages of immunisation and breast feeding were significantly associated with living in a deprived area and with increasing parity. This was not found within black or black British and Pakistani ethnic groups.

Discussion Practices that are protective of child health were consistently less likely to be adopted by white mothers living in deprived areas. Methods of health education and service delivery that are designed for the general population are unlikely to be successful in this context, and evidence of effective interventions needs to be established.

  • Breast feeding
  • child health
  • deprivation
  • ethnic minorities SI
  • immunisation
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

The uptake and adoption of preventive interventions by mothers of young children is a key component of public health policy to reduce child health inequalities in the UK.1 2 Immunisation and breast feeding provide children with a healthy start in life, not least by protecting against infectious diseases.3 4 Increasing rates of breast feeding in disadvantaged groups is identified as an important step in actions to reduce inequalities in infant mortality.5 Key social and demographic indicators of disadvantage that are associated with lower uptake of immunisation and/or breast feeding include lower socioeconomic status, lower level of education, teenage motherhood, single parenthood and multiparity.6–8

Delivering interventions that have an impact on inequalities in practices that are protective of child health is a particular challenge in inner city areas of the UK with ethnically diverse populations, since black and ethnic minority (BME) groups tend to be clustered in the most deprived neighbourhoods.9 The extent to which ethnic group determines inequalities over and above those associated with poverty is thus fundamental to the equitable provision of preventive services in infancy and early childhood.

Influential evidence on the determinants of inequalities in health by ethnic group in adulthood has, in general, shown that the relationship between poorer health and membership of a BME group is explained by relative deprivation, given the concentration of BME groups in deprived areas and thus the effects of poverty and social disadvantage on their health.10 11 Infant mortality rates (IMRs) are currently used as the headline indicator to measure child health inequality in the UK, and these suggest some degree of health disadvantage in infancy associated with BME status.12 In 2005 IMRs in both Pakistani and Caribbean ethnic groups were twice that of the white British group. However, the extent to which IMR constitutes a reliable marker of child health inequality in this context is questionable for two reasons. Firstly, evidence suggests that high infant mortality for women of Pakistani origin is associated with congenital anomalies, and that for Caribbean women with very preterm births. These conditions are unlikely to be related to deprivation.13

Secondly there are a relatively small number of infant deaths in this country. The rate of infant deaths was 5.0 per 1000 population in England in 2002–20045 ranging from 1.6 per 1000 live births to 11.9 per 1000 live births in the 354 local authority areas. Measurement problems with using small numbers are compounded when breakdown of the figures by ethnicity are considered, since BME groups constitute a relatively small proportion of the UK population (8% according to the 2001 census).

In this paper we examine the extent to which deprivation is the common factor that explains inequalities both between and within ethnic groups across three contrasting preventive practices in childhood, uptake of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, uptake of the triple vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) and breast feeding. In this endeavour, we are focusing not directly on health itself, but on maternal behaviours that are health promoting. The relation between deprivation and adoption of such behaviours is likely to be mediated by factors as various as access to healthcare, beliefs about the efficacy of an intervention, cultural/social group norms and support networks. Interestingly, recent studies that focus on only one of these three preventive practices show higher rates of immunisation and breast feeding for South Asian than for white infants, even when the confounding effect of relative deprivation has been taken into account, although there is less consistency for black or black British infants; some studies have found lower rates of immunisation for this group than for South Asian and white infants, although these have not consistently controlled for relative deprivation.7 8 14–18 The study presented here builds on this evidence by comparing immunisation and breast feeding practice between white, mixed, South Asian and black or black British ethnic groups for infants born in the city of Manchester, the 4th most deprived local authority in the UK, where in some areas BME groups constitute over one-third of the population. In addition, we examine the socioeconomic and demographic factors that are associated with variations in these practices within the three largest ethnic groups in this area: black or black British, Pakistani and white. No previous research has undertaken such a comparative analysis for a community-based population.

Methodology

Data were drawn from the Child Health System database for the city of Manchester, UK. These data were collected from two sources: (1) the formal notification of birth, which contains mandatory information collected by the midwife immediately after the birth of all babies and includes basic demographic details of mother and child, previous obstetric history and birth details; (2) a Personal Child Health Record that is issued on the birth of every child by all the Manchester Primary Care Trusts. This document is the main record of the child's health, growth and development and is used by everyone involved in the care of the child from birth to school entry and contains information about feeding practice and child immunisations from 8 weeks to 3–5 years. Each section of the Child Health Record is produced in triplicate with the top copy remaining in the Child Health Record, and, on completion, one copy is retained by the health visitor and the third copy returned to the Child Health Department for entry on to the database.

This study covers the period from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2007 during which a total of 31 521 births were recorded. However, this analysis is limited to 20 203 children born during the study period coded as being of white, mixed, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and black or black British ethnicity in the Child Health System database. Together, these ethnic groupings make up ∼97% of the city of Manchester population. The following variables were extracted from this database.

Maternal characteristics

Self-report of ethnicity has been collected on this database since 2002, using a categorisation based on the 2001 census. The following are the ethnic group categories that were used as the basis for analysis by ethnic group in this study:

  • White: this category includes white British, white Irish and any other white background.

  • Mixed: this category includes white and black Caribbean, white and black African, white and Asian and any other mixed background (eg, black and Asian, black and Chinese, black and white, Chinese and white, Asian and Chinese).

  • Asian and Asian British. Data for Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi (South Asian ethnic groups) have been included in this category.

  • Black or black British. This category includes black Caribbean, black African and any other black background.

Other maternal characteristics that have been used in this analysis are age (<17, 17–18, 19–25, 26–29 30–34, 35+) parenthood status (one-parent family or not) and parity (no previous births, 1 previous birth, 2 previous births, 3 or more previous births).

Measurement of breast feeding and immunisation

Breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum is recorded as ‘fully breast fed’, ‘partially breast fed’ or ‘not breast fed’. For this analysis, the first two categories have been combined to produce the dichotomous variable ‘breast fed: yes/no’, since the intention of the analysis was to establish the uptake of breast feeding as a health-promoting behaviour and its variation by ethnic group. The triple vaccine immunisation against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus is offered to children 8, 12 and 16 weeks after birth. The Child Health System database records information on the children who have received all three inoculations as a single variable and this has been used to measure uptake (‘yes/no’). The MMR vaccine is offered to children at 13 months, but can be administered up to the age of 2; this was the cut-off point for measurement of uptake.

Measurement of deprivation

Area level of deprivation was measured using the Income Deprivation Affecting Children (IDAC) Index which is a subset of the Income Deprivation domain of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004.19 Calculation of the IDAC Index is based on the percentage of children under 16 who are living in families in receipt of Income Support and Income-Based Job Seekers Allowance or in families in receipt of Workers Families Tax Credit or Disabled Persons Tax Credit whose equivalised income is below 60% of the median, before housing costs.

Using IDAC scores for the constituent Lower Super Output Areas, the mean level of area deprivation for each of the 32 wards in Manchester was calculated and divided into quartiles. The most affluent wards in Manchester had a range of IDAC scores between 0.12 and <0.37, the 2nd quartile between >0.37 and <0.47, the 3rd quartile between >0.47 and < 0.54, and the least affluent quartile between >0.54 and 0.73. In the statistical analysis, the 2nd and 3rd quartiles have been merged.

Data were anonymised at source. The local ethnics committee agreed that in this circumstance ethics approval was not required for the study.

Analysis

We first calculated the distribution of our sample by maternal age, parity, parenthood status, ethnic group and area level of deprivation using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were then used to examine the independent association of ethnic group with MMR uptake by 2 years, triple vaccine uptake by 16 weeks post partum, and breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum. The final analysis examined predictors of immunisation and breast feeding within the main ethnic groups in Manchester—white, Pakistani and black or black British ethnic groups. The independent variables entered into logistic regression models were maternal age, parenthood status, parity and area deprivation level. Each of these variables was controlled for the others in the logistic regression models.

Results

Table 1 shows that just under half of the sample lived in the most deprived areas of Manchester (43%). In addition, 13% of the population were single parents, 1% were aged under 17, and 5% were aged between 17 and 18 years at the time of birth. The largest ethnic minority groups were Pakistani (15%) and black or black British (15%), with whites constituting 51% of the sample.

Table 1

Maternal characteristics of the sample by ethnic group

Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were differentially distributed across ethnic groups. Some 43% of white mothers and 51% of mothers with mixed ethnicity lived in areas of high deprivation. However, those most likely to live in these areas were of black or black British ethnicity (68%). In contrast, members of South Asian ethnic groups were more likely to live in more affluent areas. For example, only 19% of Pakistanis lived in deprived areas. Single parenthood and teenage motherhood were most commonly characteristic of mothers of white (17%, 9%, respectively), mixed (18%, 9%) and black or black British ethnicity (14%, 5%), but were uncommon in South Asian ethnic minority groups. In terms of parity, members of black or black British, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups were more likely to have larger families with two or more previous births (38%, 35%, 41%, respectively) compared with white mothers (25%).

For health-promoting behaviours, in the sample as a whole, 90% of children had been MMR vaccinated, 93% had received all three courses of the triple vaccine, and 58% were breast fed at 2 weeks post partum. Table 2 shows that there were distinct patterns of MMR/triple uptake and breast feeding for the largest ethnic groups. White babies were least likely to have had the MMR vaccine (88%), and infants from Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups were most likely to have been vaccinated (96%, 95%, 95%).

Table 2

Immunisation uptake and breast feeding for white, mixed, South Asian and black/black British ethnic groups

The lowest uptake rate for the triple vaccine was observed for white (92%) and mixed ethnicity (91%) and highest for Indian (94%), Pakistani (95%) and Bangladeshi (96%) ethnic groups.

Breast feeding was most common among black and black British mothers (89%). Over two-thirds of women in South Asian ethnic groups were breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum; the highest percentage was for Indians (85%). In contrast, only 36% of white mothers were breast feeding at this time, although this figure was higher for women of mixed ethnicity (58%).

Table 3 shows that, for white mothers, living in a deprived area was significantly associated with lower uptake of the MMR and triple vaccines and breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum. There were no significant relationships between these outcome measures and area level of deprivation for Pakistani mothers. Black or black British mothers were significantly more likely to be breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum if they lived in a deprived area (OR=2.41, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.86, p<0.001).

Table 3

Independent predictors of immunisation and breast feeding within white, Pakistani and black or black British ethnic groups

Multiparity was also a strong independent predictor of lower uptake across all three measures for white women only, with the likelihood of MMR and triple vaccination and breast feeding decreasing with increasing parity.

White women who were single parents were significantly less likely to breast feed than those with partners (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, p<0.001). The latter was also the case for black or black British mothers (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.89, p<0.02).

Younger white mothers, particularly those aged 25 or under, were significantly less likely to take up the triple vaccine and to breast feed at 2 weeks post partum than older mothers (>35 years). There was no similarly consistent relationship between age and uptake of vaccination for Pakistani and black or black British mothers.

Discussion

Principal findings

The health disadvantage of white infants living in deprived areas

This research shows that ethnicity is associated with important variations in the practice of health-promoting behaviours in infancy and that differences between ethnic groups remain after area level of deprivation has been taken into account. In this study, black or black British infants were most likely to be breast fed, and Pakistani and Bangladeshi infants most likely to be vaccinated with both MMR and triple vaccines. Immunisation and breast feeding were lowest for white infants.

This study exposes the unique disadvantage of children born to white mothers living in deprived areas. These mothers were more likely to be single parents or teenage mothers—both of which are indicators of social exclusion—but infants were also less likely to be breast fed and to be vaccinated. Typically uptake of immunisation and breastfeeding initiations became less likely with each new child that was born into a family. The health impact of socioeconomic disadvantage is thus compounded for white infants by lower adherence to practices conferring a health advantage. Most notably, this is not the case for black or black British infants whose chance of being brought up in a deprived area was even greater than that of the white infants in this sample. Within this ethnic group there were no significant associations between lower rates of breast feeding and immunisation and area level of deprivation; this was also the case for Pakistanis, although these mothers were less likely to live in deprived areas.

Strengths and weaknesses of study design

One of the main strengths of the study is its location in an inner city area with an ethnically diverse population. This enabled a breakdown of the BME sample into subgroups with substantial numbers that allowed for the analysis of inequalities within—as well as between ethnic groups. In order to maximise numbers for within-group analyses, black or black British ethnicity was not disaggregated into its constituent ethnic groups. In this sample the majority of people in this category were black African (64%), 19% were black Caribbean and the remaining 17% were from ‘any other black background’. There were no significant differences in immunisation uptake between these groups, although black African women were significantly more likely to breast feed (92% breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum) than black Caribbean women (79% breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum).

The location also enabled a test for the confounding effect of deprivation in an area which is the fourth most deprived local authority in England.

Access to routinely collected statistics on immunisation and breast feeding enabled a comparison of patterns of uptake by ethnic group across three outcome measures. Previous studies have focused on single outcomes only.

The poor coding of ethnic group in routinely collected data sources is a common problem for research in the UK.20 16 15 In the time period covered by this study (2002–2007) almost a third of entries on the Child Health System database were incomplete for ethnicity (9846/31 521). Analyses of possible bias indicated that a large proportion of the missing values emanated from an area of Manchester with a predominantly white population and with no significant movement of BME groups into the area between the 1991 and 2001 census. When the investigators compared the distribution of the sample by ethnicity with 2001 census data for Manchester for children aged 0–4, it was clear that the missing values led to an underestimation of white ethnicity as a percentage of the total population and an overestimation of BME groups, particularly black or black British infants (supplementary table 1), although it is also a possibility that the sample in the Child Health System database is indicative of a trend towards the decline of the white population in ethnically diverse inner city areas and the increase in ethnic minority populations.21 Following the assumption that the missing values were predominantly of white ethnicity did not significantly alter the demographic profile of the sample white population in terms of gender, age or parity (supplementary table 2). However, it did indicate that those with missing ethnicity codes were less likely to be deprived and more likely to breast feed than the white study sample. Including these values as ‘white’ would decrease the proportion living in deprived areas from 43% to 39% and increase those breast feeding by 5%.

Entry of breastfeeding data on to the Child Health System database was also poor, with only 8946/20 203 records for breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum. However, the reliability of the findings are enhanced by replicating the results at another time point, for breast feeding at initiation (supplementary table 3). Tests for representativeness revealed that there were no significant differences by ethnic group or by area of deprivation between the characteristics of the whole sample and the missing-values sample for breast feeding at 2 weeks post partum. It is therefore unlikely that missing values were a source of bias in the study. Moreover the numbers available for analysis of breast feeding by ethnic group are more substantial than those of comparable studies based on the UK populations, in which breast feeding data are based on retrospective self-report.8 22

A further limitation of this study is that deprivation was measured at the area level rather than using individual level measures of socioeconomic or educational statuses, which were not available on the Child Health System database. Some proxies of social disadvantage at the individual level such as teenage motherhood and single parenthood were, however, available, and these display similar trends to findings on the basis of area level of deprivation.

Interpretation of results

Socioeconomic and cultural context of health-promoting behaviours in infancy

The fact that patterns of association between immunisation and breast feeding and relative deprivation within the white ethnic group do not generalise to black or black British and Pakistani ethnic groups suggests that the role of relative deprivation as a determinant of such behaviours is dependent on the extent to which other possible explanatory factors such as access to healthcare, beliefs about the efficacy of immunisation and breast feeding, cultural/social norms and support networks vary according to socioeconomic status. For example, a qualitative study that explored decisions about infant feeding method for mothers living in deprived areas in the UK found a characteristic set of norms and values associated with breast feeding that were embedded in support networks.23 Mothers were prepared to give breast feeding a ‘go’, but there was a strong expectation of difficulties and even failure. Expertise and confidence with bottle feeding was more widespread among support networks of family and friends and women relied strongly on this advice in the transition from hospital to home. A recent cross-cultural study of breastfeeding initiation comparing ethnic groups in the UK and the USA also concluded that the relationship between socioeconomic status and infant feeding practice is strongly influenced by the cultural/social context. Kelly et al22 found that the advantage shared by black and other ethnic minority groups in the UK with regard to breast feeding was not observed in the USA, where the lowest rate of breast feeding was found amongst disadvantaged non-Hispanic black mothers.

Similar conclusions can be drawn from the higher immunisation rates for South Asian infants.16 24 For example, the higher uptake of MMR vaccine for mothers of South Asian ethnicity has been attributed to trust in the judgement of health professionals, a tradition of belief within communities in the protective effect of child immunisation, and language barriers leading to a lack of awareness of the debate about the safety of MMR.16 The health advantage for infants from South Asian ethnic groups could also relate to the selective migration of healthier women of childbearing age whose positive attitudes towards child protection are drawn from practices in their country of origin.13 South Asian communities in Manchester increased by half from the 1991 to 2001 censuses, with the largest increase in the Pakistani ethnic group.21

Policy implications

The advent of the NHS was marked by improvements in maternal and child health that were the consequence of preventive services that reached the poorest people in the UK population. The problem identified in this study is that, particularly for white infants living in deprived inner city areas in the UK, the health effects of socioeconomic disadvantage are compounded by less than optimum adherence to practices that are protective of child health. Reliance on methods of health education and service delivery that are designed for the general population are unlikely to be successful in this context, but the evidence base of interventions developed specifically for disadvantaged populations is sparse and characterised by small-scale studies.25 In general, the evidence that does exist suggests that methods of service delivery that take into account the social and cultural context of mothers living in deprived areas are more effective in increasing preventive practice. For example, peer support in the community has been found to increase breast feeding for low-income women and adolescent mothers and non-professional voluntary support to improve immunisation uptake in deprived communities.25–32

This study identified ethnic inequalities in uptake of immunisation and breastfeeding initiation that favoured BME groups and that were independent of relative deprivation; this has implications for the targets set by the Department of Health for monitoring change in child health inequalities. The findings of our study suggest that figures for breastfeeding initiation and immunisation are likely to be inflated in deprived areas by the presence of South Asian and black or black British ethnic minority groups, and changes over time could reflect the mobility of these populations rather than the impact of policy interventions. A similar picture would emerge for rates of immunisation. Coding for ethnic group membership is not as yet common practice in routinely collected Child Health System data and the poor quality of record completion has been noted elsewhere.16 And yet these data are essential for monitoring inequalities in uptake of preventive interventions in infancy and early childhood.

In the UK, change in child health inequalities is currently monitored using the headline indicator of ‘a reduction of at least 10% in the gap in infant mortality between manual groups and the population as a whole by 2010’.5 The extent to which this constitutes a marker of child health advantage and disadvantage that is useful for locality-based policies is questionable, particularly in deprived inner city areas with ethnically diverse populations.

What is already known on this subject

  • There is acceptance that inequalities in health by ethnic group are, in general, explained by relative deprivation.

  • A review of the evidence focusing on interventions that are protective of health in early childhood suggests the independent effect of ethnicity as a source of inequality.

What this study adds

  • This study compares three interventions—uptake of MMR, triple vaccine and breast feeding—across ethnic groups taking into account the potential confounding effect of relative deprivation.

  • It shows that only for the white ethnic group is lower uptake of immunisation and breast feeding consistently associated with deprivation and that for this group the likelihood of uptake of all three interventions decreases with increasing parity.

  • Equitable provision of preventive services in early childhood needs to take account of both ethnicity and deprivation as sources of inequality.

Acknowledgments

We thank all those working with the Child Health System database in Manchester for their contribution to this project. Particular thanks are due to Jeanette Beckett and Paul Westhead. We also thank the three reviewers of this article for their helpful and constructive comments.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Professor Deborah Baker died shortly before this article was accepted for publication.

  • Funding Manchester Primary Care Trust, NHS Manchester, Mauldeth House, Mauldeth Road, West Manchester M21 7RL, UK.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.