Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The impact of social context on socio-demographic risk factors for suicide: a synthesis of data from case–control studies
  1. M J Crawford1,
  2. B Kuforiji1,
  3. P Ghosh2
  1. 1Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
  2. 2West London Mental Health NHS Trust, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr M J Crawford, Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Claybrook Centre, 37 Claybrook Road, London W6 8LN, UK; m.crawford{at}


Background and objective While risk factors for suicide have been established, the impact of social context in moderating the impact of these factors is poorly understood.

Methods Data from case–control studies published between 1950 and 2006 that examined socio-demographic risk factors for suicide in clinical, occupational and general populations were extracted. Odds ratios for risk factors for suicide (employment, ethnicity, living circumstances and marital status) were correlated with the prevalence of these risk factors among controls.

Results Data were extracted from 54 studies. Negative correlations were demonstrated for the odds ratio and prevalence of unemployment (ρ=−0.73), living alone (ρ=−0.46) and being from an ethnic minority community (ρ=−0.68).

Conclusion The impact of some socio-demographic risk factors for suicide appears to be accentuated when they are less prevalent in the population from which cases are derived. When assessing an individual's risk of suicide, consideration should be given to the prevalence of risk factors in the area where the individual lives.

  • Suicide
  • social context
  • case–control
  • unemployment
  • case control ME
  • social factors in
  • suicide SI
  • unemployment
  • health

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding Work on this project was supported by an educational grant from Imperial College London.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.