Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The value of presenting at scientific conferences: reflections by a couple of early career researchers
  1. V Ridde1,2,
  2. K S Mohindra3,4
  1. 1
    Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2
    Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3
    School of Public and Population Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  4. 4
    Global Health Research Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  1. Dr V Ridde, USI/CRCHUM; 3875 St-Urbain, 507, Montréal, QC, H2W 1V1; valery.ridde{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Homo academicus, to use a term coined by Pierre Bourdieu, is a special species and for those of us embarking on our careers, we must be able to demonstrate our potential ability to not only survive but to excel in the academic jungle if we hope to secure our first post as an assistant professor or a junior researcher. The selection criteria include a lengthy list of publications in journals with the highest possible impact factor, an established research programme demonstrating the capacity to be an independent researcher, and extensive experience as communicators, both as invited speakers and as presenters at scientific conferences. Although there is much to be said on all of these aspects, our commentary focuses on this last point, as we should not forget the words of Max Weber:1 “of all of the pedagogical tasks, the most difficult is that of communicating scientific problems in such a way that an unprepared yet gifted individual will be able to understand and …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None.