Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Understanding privatisation’s impacts on health: lessons from the soviet experience
  1. D Stuckler1,
  2. L King2,
  3. A Coutts3
  1. 1
    University of Cambridge, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences and King’s College, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2
    University of Cambridge, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences and Emmanuel College, Cambridge, UK
  3. 3
    University of Cambridge, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences and Magdalene College, Cambridge, UK
  1. Dr D Stuckler, University of Cambridge, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences and King's College, Cambridge, UK; ds450{at}cam.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

If privatisation ever had a significant impact on health, it would show up in the former Soviet Union. Compare Margaret Thatcher the “Great Privatiser”, who privatized roughly 30 state-owned companies during her 11-year tenure, to Boris Yeltsin’s regime, which under the guidance of Jeffrey Sachs and World Bank economists,13 privatised over 15 000 large state-owned companies in less than 2 years. Such an episode of privatisation as that seen in Russia during the early- to mid-90s remains unparalleled in both its scale and its scope.4

Not all former Soviet countries took such a radical approach to privatisation. Many opted for a more gradual …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared.