Objective: Evidence on the association between job strain and ischaemic disease is mixed. This study examined whether including older age individuals in a cohort used to assess job strain attenuates findings towards the null.
Design: A prospective cohort study with baseline screening in 1992–5. A follow-up for ischaemic disease until 2003 was based on linkages to national registries. Ischaemic disease was corroborated by objective criteria (hospitalisation as a result of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina or ischaemic stroke; or death from ischaemic heart disease, cardiac arrest or ischaemic stroke).
Participants: 3160 male employees aged 19–65 years without pre-existing or current ischaemic disease.
Results: 93 cases of incident ischaemic disease were recorded. In the 19–55 year age group, the participants with job strain had a 1.76 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.95) times higher age-adjusted risk of incident ischaemic disease than those free of strain. Further adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors had little effect on this association, but the impact of job strain was reduced by 70% to non-significant after the inclusion of employees older than 55 years in the cohort (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.96).
Conclusions: Including older employees in a cohort may dilute the effect of job strain on cardiovascular disease and is a potential reason for inconsistent findings in previous studies.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: The study was originally financed by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, grant no 2004-2021 and later by grants 2004-2021 and 2005-0734, as part of the SLOSH project. MK and JV were supported by the Academy of Finland (grant nos 117604 and 124271) and the Finnish Environment Fund.
Competing interests: None declared.
Contributors: MK was guarantor for the paper. MK, TT, HW, JV and LA designed the hypothesis, analysed or interpreted the data and wrote the paper.