Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Response to findings on association between temperature and dose–response coefficient of inhalable particles (PM10)
  1. Otto Hänninen1,
  2. Matti Jantunen2
  1. 1National Public Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health, PO Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Otto Hänninen
 National Public Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health, PO Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland; otto.hanninen{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The scientific community is currently very interested in the effect modification of air pollution by meteorological variables. The recent paper by Dr Nawrot and colleagues reports findings from a time-series epidemiology study on the effects of temperature on the association between relative mortality risk and PM10 in Belgium.1 Their 7-year data showed a stronger overall association and no threshold between PM10 and mortality in summer, but a weaker association and a threshold of 30 μg/m3 in winter. Based on these findings they state that “the shape of the dose–response relationship curve between air pollution and mortality strongly depends on outdoor temperature”.

We would like to point out that, although a weaker dependency cannot be ruled out, at least a substantial fraction of the observation is most likely attributable to the well-known relationship between personal exposures and air pollution levels at fixed monitoring sites. This relationship is strongly modified by the amount of time spent indoors. Infiltration of outdoor air PM2.5 particles indoors reduces exposure levels relative to ambient levels by 30–40% on average in Europe.2 The associated strong seasonal pattern3 is caused by variation in the times for which windows …

View Full Text