Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Hair in toxicology: an important bio-monitor
  1. Nastaran Eizadi-Mood

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Edited by Desmond John Tobin. Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2005, $199, pp 355. ISBN 0-85404-587-2

    Hair in Toxicology: an important bio-monitor is a scientific and practical book. Hair testing began slowly about 28 years ago, initiated perhaps by Baumgartner’s pioneering article. Sachs suggested an erratic growth thereafter, with a “gold rush” period between 1986 and 1992, typified by relatively uncritical use of hair testing, followed by a “hang over” period between 1992 and 1996 characterised by more critical reflection. It seems that a renewed “gold rush”—at least of published papers if not of conclusive results—began thereafter. Hair allegedly offers one crucial potential advantage when compared with—for example, blood or urine as a medium for divination—the long time window. Whereas blood and urine can only indicate use for a few days, hair offers the possibility of retrospective use examination for at least several months. A number of other advantages of using hair are sometimes cited (difficult to falsify, easy to store, lengthy shelf life, low body invasion, etc.). Hair …

    View Full Text