Change in the total and independent effects of education and occupational social class on mortality: analyses of all Finnish men and women in the period 1971–2000

Pekka Martikainen; Jenni Blomgren; Tapani Valkonen

doi:10.1136/jech.2006.049940

Responses

Evidence based public health policy and practice

Change in the total and independent effects of education and occupational social class on mortality: analyses of all Finnish men and women in the period 1971–2000

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Role of the prevalence of an outcome in the size of rate differences
James P. Scanlan
Published on: 4 June 2007

Published on: 4 June 2007
Role of the prevalence of an outcome in the size of rate differences
- James P. Scanlan, Attorney
Dear Editor
Martikainen et al.[1] note that relative, and in some cases absolute, socioeconomic differences in mortality have increased in the past 15-25 years in some European countries and the US, and find that over the period 1971 to 2000 such increases also occurred in Finland. The authors, however, overlook the statistical tendency whereby the rarer an outcome, the greater the relative difference between ra...
Show More

Dear Editor
Martikainen et al.[1] note that relative, and in some cases absolute, socioeconomic differences in mortality have increased in the past 15-25 years in some European countries and the US, and find that over the period 1971 to 2000 such increases also occurred in Finland. The authors, however, overlook the statistical tendency whereby the rarer an outcome, the greater the relative difference between rates of experiencing it and the smaller the relative differences between rates of avoiding it.[2-6.] Thus, with respect to the observed increasing relative socioeconomic differences in mortality rates in many countries in recent decades (presumably including Finland), a key factor is that mortality has been declining. In such circumstances, one should expect increasing relative differences in mortality (though declining relative differences in survival rates). But without more, neither the increasing relative difference in mortality rates nor the declining relative difference in survival rates should be regarded as indicating meaningful changes in health inequality.
In situations where absolute differences in mortality are increasing during times of a general decline in mortality, there may be more reason to regard such increase as indicating a meaningful worsening of health inequality.[2,3] But one would have to explore the specifics of the situations to draw such conclusion with any confidence.
The tendency for relative differences in mortality to be larger where an outcome is rarer is also a reason why one would expect relative educational and occupational social class difference to be larger in younger than older age groups,[3] a pattern that the authors note and support with data in Table 3.. But one would generally expect relative differences in survival to be larger among the older age groups, though the article does not provide the data to determine whether that is the case. So one ought not to regard the larger relative mortality differences in mortality among the young to suggest anything meaningful
It is hard to know whether these purely statistical factors affect the measuring of the roles of education and occupation in the observed mortality differences. But for reasons noted in the preceding paragraphs it is usually difficult to draw meaningful inferences about any changes relating to health inequalities without considering the implications of those factors. And, given the influence of the prevalence of an outcome in the size of differences in experiencing or avoiding it, it is important that a study of patterns of change in any aspects of inequalities in mortality show the various mortality rates at the points in time used in the analyses.
References
1. Martikainen P, Blomgren J, Valkonen T. Change in the total and independent effects of education and occupational social class on mortality: analyses of all Finnish men and women the period 1971-2000. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:499-505.
2. Scanlan JP. Can we actually measure health disparities? Chance 2006:19(2):47-51: http://www.jpscanlan.com/images/Can_We_Actually_Measure_Health_Disparities.pdf.
3. Scanlan JP. The misinterpretation of health inequalities in the United Kingdom. Paper presented at: British Society for Population Studies Annual Conference 2006, Southampton, England, Sept. 18-20, 2006: http://www.jpscanlan.com/images/BSPS_2006_Complete_Paper.pdf.
4. Scanlan JP. Measuring health disparities. J Public Health Manag Pract 2006;12(3):294 [Lttr]: http://www.nursingcenter.com/library/JournalArticle.asp?Article_ID=641470.
5. Scanlan JP. Race and mortality. Society 2000;37(2):19-35: http://www.jpscanlan.com/images/Race_and_Mortality.pdf.
6. Scanlan JP. Divining difference. Chance 1994;7(4):38-9,48: http://jpscanlan.com/images/Divining_Difference.pdf.
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top

Main menu

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password