Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Are program evaluators judges and/or knowledge brokers?

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

As Bourdieu1 understood perfectly well, it comes as no surprise that a multidisciplinary field as vast as that of program evaluation, much like public health,2 3 lacks a universally accepted definition. By questioning the way I conduct evaluations in the public health field, a new factor emerged in relation to the traditional definitions: my tendency to carry out evaluations using a process that strives to share knowledge with the stakeholders. Upon reading the preceeding sentence, evaluation specialists will quickly have categorised me as a so-called “fourth-generation” evaluator, grouped with those who have a responsive disposition.4 Beyond the rhetoric, I will strive to show how I have been able, in three settings on three different continents, to act as a “knowledge broker”5 by creating a favourable environment for …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None.