Responses

PDF
Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Effects of standard adjustment approaches on relative and absolute inequalities

    In a 2006 comment [1] on the article by Lynch et al.,[2] I pointed out that the authors’ findings of different contributions of risk factors to relative and absolute inequalities in CHD rates were functions of the fact that the authors studied the effects of the elimination of risk factors rather the effects of adjusting for the implications of differing risk profiles in different education groups. In making this point,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Understanding social gradients in adverse outcomes within high and low risk populations

    Dear Editor,

    In seeking to resolve the seeming paradox whereby risk factors have been found to account for a very high proportion of coronary heart disease (CHD) but only a small part of the social gradient in CHD, Lynch et al. present the CHD rates among groups with different levels of education both for a population at large and for the part of that population without any risk factors.1 Comparing the large differ...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.