Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 27 April 2016
- Published on: 27 April 2016
- Published on: 27 April 2016Re: Skinfold thicknessShow More
Dear Dr Gill,
The decision to use fourths of BMI, rather than a more traditional five-group categorisation of BMI (i.e., < 18 kg/m2, 18-25 kg/m2, 25-30 kg/m2, 30-35 kg/m2, > 35 kg/m2) was based on the availability of data. Though we considered using the more traditional approach, there were insufficient numbers of subjects and fatal events in the extreme BMI categories to justify its use. There were only...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 27 April 2016BMI and mortality riskShow More
Dear Editors,
We were surprised by the conclusions drawn by Kim, Meade and Haines in their recent article ‘Skinfold thickness, body mass index, and fatal coronary heart disease: 30 year follow up of the Northwick Park heart study’, published in your journal.
Whilst table one does show a significant difference between the distribution of BMI in the cohort who die of CHD and those who do not, the same da...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.