Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Re: Residence in mountainous compared with lowland areas in relation to total and coronary mortalityPublished on: 27 April 2016
- Published on: 27 April 2016
- Published on: 27 April 2016Re: Residence in mountainous compared with lowland areas in relation to total and coronary mortalityShow More
Dear Editor,
In this paper the longer survival of inhabitants of Arachova, Greece at 950 metres elevation, compared with 2 lowland villages was ascribed to the exercise enforced by the mountainous terrain.
There may be an additional explanation to do with food. Hauswirth et al. High w-3 Fatty Acid Content in Alpine Cheese. (Circulation 2004;109:l03-7) report from Switzerland that cheeses from alpine past...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 27 April 2016Cancer and altitude differencesShow More
Dear Editor
In their prospective study, Baibas et al (JECH 2005;59(4):274- 8)showed that, in a Greek mountain village at 950 metres, total mortality and not merely coronary mortality was lower than in two lowland villages. What follows assumes that the cancer figures included within "other causes" follow this pattern.
In 'Geographic Cancer Risk and Intracellular Potassium/Sodium ratios'.Cancer Detection...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.