Responses

Download PDFPDF

Excess in cardiovascular events on Mondays: a meta-analysis and prospective study
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Change along the time
    • Wenbin Liang, taking master of public health in Curtin University

    Dear Editor,

    I do agree that there is an excess of events on Mondays, but I believe it would be affected by the changes in the components of the population at risk, if one or both of the two hypotheses: higher level of stress on Mondays in employed people sudden increase in alcohol consumption at weekends are true, as there two factors are more likely to affect certain age groups.

    For example, there a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Author's Reply
    • Annette J Dobson, Professor of Biostatistics
    • Other Contributors:
      • Adrian G Barnett

    Dear Editor,

    We obtained estimates of the excess of events on Mondays from the published reports of each study. Then we meta-analysed the results using random effects models specifically to allow for differences between studies. A measure of heterogeneity was calculated and is reported in Table 3, together with point and interv...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: 'Excess in cardiovascular events on Mondays: a meta-analysis and prospective study'

    Dear Editor,

    In this research, the researchers have used ^m%=100(m/N-1/7)/1/7 to analyse the results, however, there are great differences among the studies which were used, and within many of the studies, the events happened over a large time period, thus using ^m% to analyse would lead to great bias. For example in a model only include two studies, each of which only include one year period of observation, now,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.