Responses

Download PDFPDF

Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's second reply to Boyle

    Dear Editor

    Boyle [1] raises very interesting points that deserve rigorous research and debate -see, for example, a recent editorial in BMJ by Ferries [2] on these and related issues. I believe that the debate over these issues contributes to increase their visibility for the research and professional communities, a visibility that hopefully will increase public, scientific and professional concern for domestic...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: Author's reply
    Dear Editor

    Gracia is right about the "softer" benefits of routine inquiry for domestic violence and the role of societal attitudes is crucial in overcoming this problem.[1] Certainly the role of public awareness campaigns, though difficult to evaluate, has probably reduced social tolerance towards violence against women. Evidence and the lack of evidence is a tricky issue for domestic violence screening. This seems t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Author's reply

    Dear Editor

    The letter by Boyle points out that there is not sufficient evidence to recommend screening for domestic violence, which is not to say that there is sufficient evidence to recommend against screening.[1] Recommendations for screening or routine inquiry for domestic violence have been made on other grounds.

    For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that “there is insuffici...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Domestic violence screening, evidence is lacking

    Dear Editor

    The editorial by Gracia highlights the hidden nature of domestic violence and he is right to outline the role of society in uncovering this problem.[1] Definitional issues for epidemiologists are extremely complex in this field, and are further complicated by differing definitions used in criminal justice and voluntary organisations. There is little clear consensus as to the definition of 'domestic' or '...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.