Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Employment status, employment conditions, and limiting illness: prospective evidence from the British household panel survey 1991–2001
  1. M Bartley,
  2. A Sacker,
  3. P Clarke
  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor M Bartley
 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK;


Objectives: To assess the relation of the incidence of, and recovery from, limiting illness to employment status, occupational social class, and income over time in an initially healthy sample of working age men and women.

Methods: Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: There were large differences in the risk of limiting illness according to occupational social class, with men and women in the least favourable employment conditions nearly four times more likely to become ill than those in the most favourable. Unemployment and economic inactivity also had a powerful effect on illness incidence. Limiting illness was not a permanent state for most participants in the study. Employment status was also related to recovery.

Conclusions: Having secure employment in favourable working conditions greatly reduces the risk of healthy people developing limiting illness. Secure employment increases the likelihood of recovery. These findings have considerable implications for both health inequality and economic policies.

  • employment conditions
  • job security
  • limiting illness
  • social class
  • unemployment
  • BHPS, British household panel survey
  • NS-SEC, National Statistics Socio-economic classification

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding: the work for this paper was funded by MRC Health of the Public grant no 9900586. Mel Bartley’s work on the paper was also supported by ESRC Fellowship Grant R000271112

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Linked Articles