You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Evidence based public health policy and practice
Smoking cessation services are reducing inequalities
  1. H Lowey1,
  2. K Tocque2,
  3. M A Bellis1,
  4. B Fullard3
  1. 1Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2North West Public Health Observatory, Liverpool John Moores University
  3. 3Directorate of Health and Social Care (North), Government Office North West, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr H L Lowey, Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, 70 Great Crosshall Street, Liverpool L3 2AB,UK; 
 H.L.Lowey{at}livjm.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.8.579

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The recent introduction of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill1 follows a whole range of strategies and subsequent interventions aimed at reducing levels of smoking in the UK. In particular, Smoking kills: a white paper on tobacco2 has resulted in national investments to develop smoking cessation services both in primary care and through specialist services elsewhere. National guidance on providing such services recommended developing them to meet the needs of local populations and consequently smoking cessation services within each health authority have adopted different delivery models.

    Although smoking is an important threat to health across all demographics, it disproportionately affects the most deprived3 and contributes to the gap in life expectancy between those most in need and those most advantaged more than any other identifiable factor. Thus, while the proportion of smokers in more advantaged groups is estimated at 15% for males and 13% for females in the most deprived groups levels are 39% and 34% respectively.4 Recognising these disparities, …

    View Full Text

    Linked Articles