Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Are smoke-free policies good for business?
  1. R Edwards1,
  2. D Reed2
  1. 1Evidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Yorkshire ASH, St Mary's Hospital, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Richard Edwards, Evidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The Medical School, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK;
 Richard.Edwards{at}man.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Studies of smoke-free policies in the hospitality trade using objective evidence have generally found no or a positive economic impact 1. Most studies are from North America and Australia. Published European studies are limited to a small study with a four month follow up period in which no adverse economic effects were demonstrated (six pubs) and popularity with customers was high (10 pubs).2 However, UK proprietors from restaurants, pubs, and other hospitality trade businesses overwhelmingly predict negative economic effects.3–5

In a recent UK national survey, 88% of respondents agreed that smoking should be restricted in restaurants and 53% in pubs.6 Despite the existence of a Public Places Charter7 promoting smoke-free policies, progress in the UK has been slow. In a Scottish survey in 2000 over half of hotels, restaurants, and cafes, and 85% of pubs allowed smoking …

View Full Text

Linked Articles