Responses

Download PDFPDF

SECURING THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND ACTING ON IT
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Re: Psychosocial factors and Public Health. Authors' reply to the eLetter by John Macleod
    Dear Editor

    The discussion triggered by this paper is a useful one. In general I agree with McLeod, and Davey Smith that we have to be careful when we make conclusions regarding etiology. Socioeconomic factors could certainly confound the relationships. Adjustment for socioeconomic factors could also conceal true relationships, however. In this literature (see the review by Schnall et al. 2000 which has been referred...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Psychosocial factors and health: response by Macleod and Davey Smith to authors' reply
    • John Macleod, Clinical Research Fellow
    • Other Contributors:
      • George Davey Smith

    Dear Editor

    We are grateful to Peter and colleagues for taking the trouble to respond to our e-letter. They raise several issues that we will try to address briefly.

    First, they say effort-reward imbalance had no relation to socio-economic status in their study. We are unclear how they assessed this – the only SES measure they mention in their paper is a white-collar/blue- collar binary distinction. Effort–r...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: Psychosocial factors and Public Health. Authors' reply to the e-letter by John Macleod
    • Richard Peter
    • Other Contributors:
      • Johan Hallqvist, Johannes Siegrist, Töres Theorell

    Dear Editor

    We agree with John Macleod concerning the importance of a better understanding of social inequalities in health. Yet, the paper to which he refers (Peter et al., 2002) [1] was not primarily intended to explain social inequalities, but rather to demonstrate an improved prediction of CHD risk by combining standardized measures of two innovative theoretical concepts of psychosocial stress at work. M...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Psychosocial factors and Public Health
    • John Macleod, Clinical Research Fellow
    • Other Contributors:
      • George Davey Smith

    Dear Editor

    Patterns of human health, particularly the inequalities in health associated with inequalities in social position, are not fully explicable in terms of the social distribution of established risk factors. This lack of understanding may hamper initiatives to ameliorate health inequalities – one of the most important contemporary social projects. The significance of these issues is reflected in the amount o...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.