Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The relation between questions indicating transient ischaemic attack and stroke in 20 years of follow up in men and women in the Renfrew/Paisley Study
Free

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is often a precursor to stroke, so identification of people experiencing TIA could assist in stroke prevention by indicating those at high risk of stroke who would benefit most from intervention for other stroke risk factors. The objective of this study was to investigate whether answers to a simple questionnaire for TIA could predict the occurrence of stroke in the following 20 years.

DESIGN Prospective cohort study, conducted between 1972 and 1976, with 20 years of follow up.

SETTING Renfrew and Paisley, Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS 7052 men and 8354 women aged 45–64 years at the time of screening completed a questionnaire and attended a physical examination. The questionnaire asked participants if they had ever, without warning, suddenly lost the power of an arm, suddenly lost the power of a leg, suddenly been unable to speak properly or suddenly lost consciousness. These four questions were taken as indicators of TIA and were related to subsequent stroke mortality or hospital admission.

MAIN RESULTS For women, each question was significantly related to stroke risk, whereas for men only the question on loss of power of arm was significantly related to stroke risk. Men and women answering two or more questions positively had double the relative rate of stroke compared with men and women answering none of the questions positively, even after adjusting for other risk factors for stroke.

CONCLUSIONS A simple questionnaire for TIA could help predict stroke over 20 years of follow up. Targeting men and women who report TIA with early treatment could help to prevent strokes from occurring.

  • prospective study
  • stroke

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) are important because people who experience such episodes have conditions that are treatable.1 2 Cerebral infarction is often preceded by single or multiple episodes of TIA.1 Interventions for stroke include lifestyle factors (smoking cessation, exercise, weight loss), drug interventions (for blood pressure, cholesterol, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, diabetes) and surgical intervention (for carotid stenosis).3 Tools to determine TIA in population studies could therefore be useful in reducing stroke incidence and mortality through identifying those at high risk of stroke, who have most to gain from interventions for modifiable stroke risk factors.4 We have been able to investigate the relation between answers to a questionnaire on TIA in participants of a large cohort study conducted in the 1970s, and subsequent stroke in a long follow up period.

Methods

The Renfrew/Paisley general population study was carried out between 1972 and 1976 and involved 7052 men and 8354 women aged 45–64 years who were resident in the towns of Renfrew and Paisley in Scotland. A response rate of nearly 80% was achieved. Full details of the study methodology have been reported previously.5 6 A questionnaire was completed by each participant and was checked when the participant attended a clinic where physical measurements were taken. Participants were asked if they had ever, without warning:

  • suddenly lost the power of an arm

  • suddenly lost the power of a leg

  • suddenly been unable to speak properly

  • suddenly lost consciousness.

These four questions were taken to be indicators of a TIA. Men and women who answered yes to a question on previous stroke were excluded from the present analysis, as their stroke may have caused one of more of the TIA symptoms. Participants with missing values for any of the TIA questions were also excluded, leaving 6919 men and 8194 women available for the analysis.

Other questions asked about smoking habit and diabetes.5 6 Cardiovascular symptoms were assessed using the Rose angina questionnaire,7 with angina defined as definite or possible.8 Severe chest pain was defined as ever having a severe pain across the front of the chest lasting half an hour or more.8 Social class was defined by the registrar general's classification9 based on occupation at time of screening. Participants were asked their regular occupation and if retired, their last full time occupation. Women were given their own occupation, except housewives who were given their husband's or father's occupation. The home address was retrospectively postcoded, enabling deprivation category defined by Carstairs and Morris to be ascertained.10 Deprivation category varies from 1 (least deprived) to 7 (most deprived) and is based on four census variables.

At the screening examination, blood pressure was recorded as the mean of two measurements taken in the seated position.5 A non-fasting blood sample was taken for the measurement of plasma cholesterol.5 Measurements of height and weight were made, enabling body mass index in kg/m2 to be calculated.

The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured at the screening examination using a vitalograph spirometer. The FEV1 score was calculated by obtaining the expected FEV1 from a linear regression equation of age and height for men and women separately, derived from a healthy subset of the population.6 Adjusted FEV1 was defined as actual FEV1 as a percentage of expected FEV1.

A six lead electrocardiogram was coded according to the Minnesota system.11 Ischaemia on ECG was defined as codes 1.1–1.3, 4.1–4.4, 5.1–5.3 or 7.1. Pre-existing coronary heart disease (CHD) was defined as having any of angina, ECG ischaemia or severe chest pain.

Study participants were flagged at the National Health Service Central Register in Edinburgh. Dates and cause of death occurring in the United Kingdom were provided, with stroke defined as ICD9 codes 430–438. Additionally, a computerised linkage with acute hospital discharges in Scotland provided records of all diagnoses of stroke between 1972 and 199512 that entailed an inpatient stay in Scotland. There was no information available on hospital admissions for stroke in the rest of the United Kingdom or on non-fatal stokes that occurred without a hospital admission. Stroke was defined as either having a hospital admission with a main diagnosis of stroke or dying of stroke in the 20 year follow up period.

Age adjusted means for continuous variables were calculated using PROC GLM of the SAS system. Categorical variables were age standardised by the direct method, using the study populations as the standard. Cox's models13 were used to calculate proportional hazards regression coefficients by answers to the TIA questions. Adjustments were made for other variables by including them in the models. Survival time was taken from date of screening until either date of hospital admission for stroke, or date of death from stroke if no hospital admission for stroke were found. Analyses were performed separately for men and women.

Results

key points
  • Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) often precedes a stroke .

  • Responses to four questions indicating previous TIA were related to stroke over 20 years of follow up.

  • Men and women answering two or more questions positively had double the risk of stroke.

  • Targeting men and women who report TIA with early treatment could aid stroke prevention.

Small proportions answered “yes” to each TIA question, with the highest number of positive responses being given to the question on lost consciousness (table 1). Very few answered “yes” to all four questions. There was no significant difference between men and women in the answers to the questions on loss of power of arm, leg or loss of consciousness (age adjusted odds ratios 0.99 (95% confidence intervals 0.80, 1.22), 1.09 (0.88, 1.34) and 0.92 (0.79, 1.06) respectively). However, women were significantly more likely than men to report suddenly being unable to speak properly (odds ratio 1.38 (1.08, 1.77)).

Table 1

Interrelations between answers to TIA questions in 6919 men and 8194 women in the Renfrew/Paisley study

Men and women who answered “yes” to individual TIA questions were, in general, less healthy than those answering “no”, for example having poorer lung function and being more likely to have bronchitis (table available from authors).

There were significant trends with number of questions answered positively for men and women for height and adjusted FEV1(inversely) and for pre-existing CHD, smoking, poor social class, deprivation category and bronchitis (positively) (table 2). For men only there were significant inverse trends for systolic blood pressure and significant positive trends for diabetes. For women only there was a significant positive trend for body mass index.

Table 2

Age adjusted risk factors by number of TIA questions answered positively

Altogether 583 men and 667 women had a hospital admission for stroke or died of stroke in the 20 year follow up period. The age adjusted 20 year stroke rate was 64.8 per 10 000 person years for men and 52.0 per 10 000 person years for women. Men and women who reported loss of power of an arm were more than twice as likely to have a stroke than men and women who answered “no” (table 3). Adjusting for risk factors attenuated the relative rates, but they were still raised and statistically significant. There were significantly higher relative rates of stroke for women, but not men, who reported loss of power of a leg, speech, loss of consciousness, or gave a positive answer to any of the TIA questions. There were no significant interactions for sex with each individual question. Adjusting for age and answers to the other three TIA questions produced significant relative rates for the question on loss of power of arm for men and women, and significant relative rates for the question on loss of consciousness for women only. When the follow up period was divided into four five year periods, strokes were more likely to occur in the later periods (the distribution of strokes in the four periods was 10%, 19%, 29% and 41%). However, men and women who answered any of the four TIA questions positively were more likely to have a stroke in the first five years of follow up than men and women not answering positively to any of the questions. The percentages for the five year periods were 21%, 15%, 30% and 34% for those answering positively and 9%, 20%, 29% and 42% for those not answering positively.

Table 3

Relative rates of stroke in 20 years by TIA questions, estimated by Cox proportional hazards models

Men and women answering two or more questions positively had double the relative rate of stroke compared with men and women answering none of the questions positively (table 4). Adjustment for risk factors attenuated the relative rates, although they remained significant at conventional levels. Women who answered one question positively also had a significantly higher relative rate of stroke, which was non-significant after adjustment for risk factors. Further analysis of specific pairs of questions compared with negative answers to all questions showed all pairs to have significantly higher age adjusted relative rates for women, and all pairs containing loss of consciousness to have significant relative rates for men.

Table 4

Relative rates of stroke in 20 years by number of TIA questions answered positively, estimated by Cox proportional hazards models

Discussion

We have shown a relation between answers to TIA questions and subsequent stroke risk. The strongest and most consistent of the questions for both men and women seemed to be the one relating to the loss of power in an arm. The other three questions did not predict stroke in men, although they did for women. Comparison of participants answering “yes” to any of the four questions with participants answering “no” to all four questions also produced different results for men and women, with significant results seen only for women. It is not clear whether women answered the questions in a different way from men, or whether women with TIA symptoms have a greater risk of stroke than men with TIA symptoms. It is possible that for men a sudden loss of power in a leg is more likely to indicate nerve entrapment than cerebral ischaemia, given that men have a higher risk than women of such back problems.14 Analysis of specific pairs of questions highlighted the importance to stroke risk of loss of consciousness together with another positive answer. This could reflect loss of consciousness on its own being related to other factors (for example postural hypotension), but in combination with other symptoms it being a good indicator of experience of a TIA.

Other TIA questionnaires in use at the time of the study used different questions: the Copenhagen city heart study asked five questions (blurring or loss of vision, double vision, limb paresis, speech disturbance and dysequilibrium).2 The Joint Committee for Stroke suggested a very detailed questionnaire, asking about frequency and length of attacks for five domains (numbness or tingling, paralysis, vision, speech and dizziness)1 and a similar questionnaire was used in a large survey of elderly persons.15 In the 1980s, the Tromsø study used three questions (paralysis, speech, vision)16 and the ARIC study asked about loss of vision, double vision, speech dysfunction, weakness or paralysis, numbness or tingling, and dizziness.17 Other studies then investigated participants answering the TIA questions positively more completely, by further questioning and physical examination,2 16 18 to find out if the symptoms were attributable to a TIA or to other causes (for example, ophthalmological problems, dizziness on standing up, migraine, nerve entrapment). In the current study, there was no further follow up of this type. Therefore participants classified as having TIA from our questionnaire are likely to include false positives. Screening questionnaires should ideally contain queries to eliminate non-specific questions.15

There have been few studies with long term follow up and they typically contained small numbers. Other studies in the literature generally had higher risks of stroke than the current study found. In Evans County, 28 of 2455 participants had TIA and two of these had a stroke after three to five years.18 In the Tromsø study, all 26 TIA cases remained stroke free in 55 months.16 In the Oxfordshire Community Stroke project, there was a 13-fold excess risk of stroke in the first year among 184 TIA cases and a sevenfold risk in seven years of follow up.19 A case-control study of TIA cases found a 4.5-fold adjusted hazard ratio for fatal or non-fatal stroke.20 A TIA aspirin trial reported 230 strokes in 2435 people with recent TIA in four years follow up.21

There are several limitations of our study. The TIA questionnaire was non-standard and the risk factors were based on one baseline survey. It is possible that the symptoms reported were attributable to other diseases and not TIA. However, more strokes occurred in the first five years of follow up in participants who answered any of the questions positively than participants not answering any of the questions positively. TIA diagnosis from questionnaire is different from TIA detected in the clinical setting, the second being likely to be more serious. Some participants in this study may have sought medical treatment, although we cannot tell. However, these simple questions identified people with more than double the risk of stroke, which compares favourably to the analogous use of the Rose angina questionnaire as a predictor of coronary heart disease mortality.8 The TIA questions could be used as quick and simple indicators of those at high risk of stroke, who have most to gain from interventions for modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors.4

To conclude, we have demonstrated that a simple questionnaire for TIA can predict stroke in 20 years of follow up. Use of such a questionnaire to detect those at risk could help prevent strokes by targeting early preventative treatment.

Acknowledgments

Pauline MacKinnon is responsible for updating mortality in the Renfrew/Paisley cohort.

References

Footnotes

  • Funding: funding was provided by Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland, and the Stroke Association.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.