Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Risk of injury and the consumption of different types of beverage: Is there an association?
  1. E Plugge,
  2. L Fletcher,
  3. S Stewart-Brown
  1. Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
  1. Emma Plugge, (emma.plugge{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The health benefits of moderate consumption and the damaging consequences of excessive consumption of alcohol are well documented.1 Injury is an important alcohol related health problem but while the role of alcohol in particular types of injury has been studied,2 there is little information on particular types of alcoholic beverage and injuries. This contrasts with the literature on cardiovascular disease and alcohol where the relation with the consumption of different beverages has been extensively explored. The evidence here indicates that there is no specific benefit associated with one type of beverage; the extra benefit associated with wine in some studies can be explained by different drinking patterns.1

We looked at data from a community survey to explore for the first time, the relation between the risk of non-fatal injury and the consumption of particular types of beverage.


We analysed data obtained from the 1997 Oxford Healthy Lifestyle Survey.3 This was carried out on a sample of 18–64 year olds randomly selected from the computerised general practitioner records for Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire and Oxfordshire in England. A 20 page questionnaire on lifestyle and health service use was mailed to subjects. It included questions about injuries requiring medical attention sustained in the previous year and about the amount and type of alcohol drunk in the past week. The survey achieved a corrected response rate of 64% (8889 of 13 800). Women and those aged 55–64 years were slightly over-represented in the sample.3

Data were analysed using SPSS version 9.0. The annual incidence rate of injury was calculated with 95% confidence intervals and analysed according to the type of alcohol consumed. Logistic regression analysis was performed by a forward stepwise method using the possible confounding variables of age, gender and units of alcohol drunk in the past week.


key points
  • Accidents are an important public health problem and the literature shows that people who consume alcohol are more likely to injure themselves than those who abstain.

  • In contrast to cardiovascular disease, there is no information on the relation between the risk of non-fatal injury and the consumption of particular types of beverage.

  • Our study shows that different accident rates between groups of drinkers of different beverages are attributable to differences in age, sex and the amount consumed rather than any intrinsic quality of the beverage.

Sixteen per cent of all respondents reported an injury requiring medical attention in the previous 12 months. Those who drank any alcohol were significantly more likely to report being injured than those who abstained (16.4% versus 12.5%, χ2=11.26, p=0.0008). Those who drank wine were less likely to have been injured than those drinking other beverages (15.3% versus 18.1%, χ2=10.53, p=0.001), and those who drank beer or alcopops were more likely to report being injured (18.9% versus 12.8%, χ2 =49.8, p=0.00000 and 21.9% versus 16.1%, χ2=10.58, p=0.001). No differences were seen for sherry and spirit drinkers.

Logistic regression revealed that when age, sex and amount of alcohol had been controlled for, there were only significant differences in the risk of injury for drinkers of beer or alcopops, although the added risk was small (odds ratios 1.17 (95% confidence intervals 1.01 to 1.36) and 1.30 (1.02 to 1.66) respectively) (table1).

Table 1

The risk of injury and the type of beverage consumed. Adjusted and unadjusted data


While confirming the association between alcohol use and accidental injury shown in many other studies,4 this study is the first to look specifically at the relation between different beverages and all types of non-fatal injury that have required medical attention. Our findings indicate that there is a relation between the type of beverage drunk and the likelihood of injury but that this probably is not because of any intrinsic quality of the beverage. Rather it can largely be explained by sex and age differences between groups of drinkers, and the amount of alcohol consumed. It would be interesting to examine whether the pattern of drinking affected the risk of injury and accounted for the slight increase in beer and alcopop drinkers, but no such data were available from the survey. People are more likely to be injured when acutely intoxicated4 and beer and alcopop drinkers may be more inclined to “binge” drink.

We acknowledge that there are certain limitations to our study because the data on alcohol consumption relate to a time period which is after the occurrence of the injury. However, as the great majority of injuries requiring medical attention had no lasting consequences, it is unlikely that alcohol consumption is affected by the experience of injury.

Studies examining the behavioural effects of different beverages show that differences between beer, wine and spirit drinkers in alcohol related problems such as drink driving, can be attributed to the differences in the age and sex of the drinker and how much and how often they drink.5 The results of our study, while looking at a different outcome, concur with these findings and reinforce the need to reduce alcohol consumption as part of any injury prevention strategy.


This study could not have been undertaken without the contribution of Sophie Petersen who collected the data for the survey.



  • Funding: the Health Services Research Unit is largely funded by the NHS Executive (South East). Emma Plugge is paid by the NHS training budget.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.