Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Marital status and suicide: some common methodological problems
  1. Y B CHEUNG,
  1. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
  1. Dr Yip (sfpyip{at}
  1. Department of Sociology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
  1. Dr Kposowa (Augustine.Kposowa{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor,—In a recent paper published in this journal, Kposowa1 reported that divorced and separated men had a higher risk of suicide than married men. Men and women of other unmarried status reportedly did not suffer any excess risk of suicide in comparison with their married counterparts. We have some reservation about the findings, and wish to point out two methodological problems that may have affected many studies in this area.

In this study marital status was enumerated at the beginning of the study period. Marital transitions between the baseline survey and death or end of follow up were unknown to the researcher. The author did mention this issue at the end of the discussion section, but seemed to suggest that the problem would not have seriously affected the findings. The failure to capture marital changes would lead to a misclassification of marital status during the follow up period and at death. The follow up period is from 1979 to 1989. Martial status would have changed during the 11 year period. For example, among the elderly, the married person would become widowed; the never married person among the age group 25–34 would have been married during the period, etc. As such, the hazard ratios based on the initial marital status would be biased towards the null value. One study in the USA2 and one in the UK3 have emphasised the importance of this misclassification error. Furthermore, there were only 545 suicide cases with a rate of approximately 10.5 per 100 000, which could be very sensitive to the possible misclassification. In this study both the models with and without adjustment for baseline factors contradict previous research results that used the information of the marital status at death.4 5 We should be very cautious about the insignificant results.

Studies have demonstrated increased psychiatric disturbances in the first year of widowhood.6 7 Afterwards the widowed return to a usual level of psychological health. This strongly supports the plausibility that widowed people may have a higher risk of suicide shortly after the death of a spouse. Widowed persons available at the baseline survey were likely to be those who had survived the initial high risk period. The study design has a selection bias that favours the survivors. Much less is known about changes in psychiatric disturbances in divorcees. The same selection bias may exist in divorced people.

There has been a considerable number of studies on marital status and suicide since Durkheim's classic study.4 5 Unfortunately progress has been prevented by some common methodological problems that are often overlooked. Our first suggestion is that much more effort should be spent on updating the marital status of participants during a follow up period. A closely related suggestion is to study the suicide risk of participants married at baseline but who become unmarried during the follow up. This will avoid the selection bias in the studies of people divorced or widowed at baseline. Secondly, testing for non-proportionality should be routinely carried out and reported if the analysis is based on the Cox model. There are various methods for the testing, such as allowing break points in a hazard function and the use of Schoenfeld residuals. An initial hazardous effect that diminishes over time is partial evidence for the above mentioned problems. No information on the proportional hazard assumption was given in the paper under discussion.


Author's reply: Marital status and suicide: some possible misunderstandings

Yip and Cheung express reservations in their letter about results in a previous report1-1 that failed to find significant effects of widowhood and being single on suicide. The purpose here is to consider their concerns.

As discussed in my article, marital status was measured at baseline. The study was not designed to estimate the effect of marital transitions, but the impact of being in a given marital status at baseline. Marital status is a time varying covariate. While such a variable may change over time, Yip and Cheung exaggerate the impact of this change on mortality. They failed to report the stunning finding by Cheung1-2 that although some respondents changed marital status during follow up, updating marital status did not have any substantive impact on mortality. The American study1-3 cited by Yip and Cheung in their letter found evidence of misclassification of marital status, and suggested that this might bias results in hazards models of mortality. However, the study1-3 used a subsample of the Longitudinal Study of Aging, which by design inevitably increases misclassification. The subsample comprised persons aged 70 years and older. Clearly, if persons in that group change marital status, it is more likely to widowhood. My study consisted of all age groups.

The authors speculate that widowed people may have a higher risk of suicide shortly after the death of a spouse. The fact is that we do not really know, and a similar argument can be made about the divorced as well. Their suicide risk may be especially high after separation.

The first suggestion made by Yip and Cheung is not feasible, as official data were used. The proportionality assumption of the model in my study was tested using methods discussed by Hosmer and Lemeshow.1-4 As no problems were detected, results were not reported.

Yip and Cheung affirm that an initial hazardous effect that diminishes over time indicates a methodological problem. I agree, but it also depends on how one interprets such an outcome. As shown in table 1-1, when break points in follow up were allowed, widowhood did not significantly increase suicide risk at baseline.

Table 1-1

Effect of marital status on suicide by selected years of follow up1-1-150

I am gratified that Yip and Cheung do not question my basic finding on divorce and suicide, but have problems with null results. I stand by my study and conclude that in the data used, widowhood and being single have no significant effects on suicide.


  1. 1-1.
  2. 1-2.
  3. 1-3.
  4. 1-4.