Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The effect of a direct payment or a lottery on questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial
  1. Paula-J Robertsa,
  2. Chris Robertsb,
  3. Bonnie Sibbaldc,
  4. David J Torgersond
  1. aSeven Brooks Medical Centre, 21 Church Street, Atherton M46 9DE, bUniversity of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, cNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, dDepartment of Health Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
  1. Dr P-J Roberts

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Postal questionnaires are frequently used in research. One way of improving response rates is to use lotteries, although the evidence for their effectiveness is equivocal.1-4 An alternative, or complementary, approach to using lotteries is to make direct payments to survey responders. Few trials have evaluated direct payment compared with lotteries.3

Methods

Questionnaires about menopause services in the North West of England were sent to a random sample of 1000 women aged 40 to 65 during September to November 1997. The questionnaires included questions about use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and women's demographic characteristics.

The sample of women were randomised in a 2 × 2 factorial trial to estimate the effectiveness of the two forms of incentive and their potential interaction within a single study. Unequal randomisation of 3 to 1 favouring no direct payment was used to minimise research costs, which led …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding: NHS NorthWest Region Research Practices Initiative.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.