<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com">
<title>Journal of Epidemiology &amp; Community Health current issue</title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com</link>
<description>Journal of Epidemiology &amp; Community Health RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Jul  1 2009 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Epidemiology &amp; Community Health</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0143-005X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/510?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jech.bmj.com/homepage/JECH_95x60.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/homepage/JECH_95x60.gif">
<title>Journal of Epidemiology &amp; Community Health</title>
<url>http://jech.bmj.com/homepage/JECH_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Colorectal cancer screening: for prevention or cure?]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fletcher, R. H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prevention, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.083675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Colorectal cancer screening: for prevention or cure?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>506</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/507?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] A scorecard for assessing progress in global public health]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/507?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.083626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] A scorecard for assessing progress in global public health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>508</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>507</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Speakers' corner] Public health in low- and middle-income countries and the clash of cultures]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob, K S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2009.086934</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Speakers' corner] Public health in low- and middle-income countries and the clash of cultures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>509</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Speakers' corner</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/510?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/510?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>The proportion of non-attenders in cervical cancer screening is high, and should be minimised. A targeted invitation to women not participating for the last 5 years in cervical screening was evaluated to determine whether it would decrease the number of these women. Increasing general practitioners&rsquo; attention to the screening programme for cervical cancer was also evaluated to determine whether it would increase participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in the county of Aarhus, Denmark. All women registered with a GP were randomised. Regardless of group allocation, all women received a normal invitation. In the intervention arm, GPs were visited to facilitate quality enhancements of the screening programme, combined with a special targeted invitation to women aged 23&ndash;59 registered with the GP but not attending screening for the last 5 years. The main outcome was the proportion of non-attenders and the secondary outcome was coverage rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>117 129 women registered with 190 GPs were included in the study. 1737 non-attenders had a Papanicolaou smear during follow-up. The decline in non-attenders was 0.87% (95% CI 0.57% to 1.16%) after 9 months in favour of the intervention. A difference of 0.94% (95% CI 0.21% to 1.67%) in the change of coverage rate was observed at 6 months, which increased to 1.97% (95% CI 0.03% to 3.91%) at 9 months in favour of the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>It is possible to decrease the proportion of non-attenders and increase the coverage rate in a screening programme for cervical cancer using a special targeted invitation to non-attenders combined with a visit to GPs. To further improve participation, other barriers must be identified and addressed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jensen, H, Svanholm, H, Stovring, H, Bro, F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Cervical screening, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.077636</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>515</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>510</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/516?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] The effects of income and education on ethnic differences in oral health: a study in US adults]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/516?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Ethnic differences exist in oral health. However, the causes of the differences have not been adequately addressed. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of socioeconomic position on ethnic differences in oral health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Data were from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the USA (1988&ndash;94). The effects of income and education on ethnic differences in perceived oral health, gingival bleeding, periodontitis and tooth loss were analysed using a series of regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The probabilities of poorer oral health were higher among African&ndash;American, Mexican&ndash;Americans and other ethnic groups than in White Americans. Adjusting for income and education resulted in a reduction in the ORs for having poorer perceived oral health (44%), tooth loss (29%), gingival bleeding (61%) and periodontitis (30%) among African&ndash;Americans than White Americans. Similar reductions in risk were observed among Mexican&ndash;Americans and other ethnic groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The results indicate that education and income play an important role in ethnic differences in oral health. Despite the major impact of socioeconomic position, the results imply that there are causes additional to socioeconomic position for ethnic differences in oral health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabbah, W, Tsakos, G, Sheiham, A, Watt, R G]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.082313</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] The effects of income and education on ethnic differences in oral health: a study in US adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>516</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Understanding the relationship of long working hours with health status and health-related behaviours]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>The objectives of this study are to identify family and job characteristics associated with long work hours, to analyse the relationship between long work hours and several health indicators, and to examine whether gender differences for both objectives exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The sample was composed of all salaried workers aged 16&ndash;64 years (3950 men and 3153 women) interviewed in the 2006 Catalonian Health Survey. Weekly work hours were categorised as less than 30 h (part-time), 30&ndash;40 (reference category), 41&ndash;50 and 51&ndash;60 h. Multiple logistic regression models separated by sex were fitted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Factors associated with long working hours differed by gender. Among men, extended work hours were related with being married or cohabiting and with being separated or divorced. In men, working 51&ndash;60 h a week was consistently associated with poor mental health status (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.24), self-reported hypertension (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.29), job dissatisfaction (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.82), smoking (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.72), shortage of sleep (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.85) and no leisure-time physical activity (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.60). Moreover, a gradient from standard working hours to 51&ndash;60 h a week was found for these six outcomes. Among women it was only related to smoking and to shortage of sleep.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The association of overtime with different health indicators among men could be explained by their role as the family breadwinner: in situations of family financial stress men work overtime in order to increase the income and/or accept poor working conditions for fear of job loss, one of them being long working hours.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artazcoz, L, Cortes, I, Escriba-Aguir, V, Cascant, L, Villegas, R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Smoking and tobacco, Health service research, Health education, Health promotion, Smoking]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.082123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Understanding the relationship of long working hours with health status and health-related behaviours]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Induced abortions and teenage births among asylum seekers in The Netherlands: analysis of national surveillance data]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Asylum seekers are assumed to be a vulnerable group with respect to sexual and reproductive health. The objective of this study was to quantify induced abortion and teenage birth indicators for this group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The population comprised all female asylum seekers aged 15&ndash;49 in The Netherlands between September 2004 and August 2005. Information was collected about induced abortions from notification forms and electronic patient files. The central agency for the reception of asylum seekers provided population and birth data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Among asylum seekers the abortion rate (14.4/1000 women) and teenage birth rate (49.1/1000) were higher than average in The Netherlands (8.6/1000 and 5.8/1000). Great differences were found between subgroups. High abortion rates were seen among women who were pregnant on arrival or got pregnant in the first months after arrival at the reception facilities. Abortion and teenage birth rates were particularly high among asylum seekers aged 15&ndash;19 from specific parts of Africa and Asia. Abortion ratios were high among asylum seekers aged 30&ndash;49 from parts of Europe and Asia. Decreases in the abortion rate and teenage birth rate were observed as the length of stay increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Abortions and teenage births were more common among asylum seekers than among the overall population of The Netherlands. Increased rates were a consequence of subgroups being at high risk. Abortion and teenage birth rates were very high among women who were pregnant on arrival or got pregnant in the first few months after arrival, but decreased as the length of stay increased.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goosen, S, Uitenbroek, D, Wijsen, C, Stronks, K]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ethics of abortion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.079368</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Induced abortions and teenage births among asylum seekers in The Netherlands: analysis of national surveillance data]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>533</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/534?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Long-term wine consumption is related to cardiovascular mortality and life expectancy independently of moderate alcohol intake: the Zutphen Study]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/534?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Light to moderate alcohol intake lowers the risk of cardiovascular mortality, but whether this protective effect can be attributed to a specific type of beverage remains unclear. Moreover, little is known about the effects of long-term alcohol intake on life expectancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The impact of long-term alcohol intake and types of alcoholic beverages consumed on cardiovascular mortality and life expectancy at age 50 was investigated in the Zutphen Study, a cohort of 1373 men born between 1900 and 1920 and examined repeatedly between 1960 and 2000. Hazard ratios (HRs) for total alcohol intake and alcohol from wine, beer and spirits were obtained from time-dependent Cox regression models. Life expectancy at age 50 was calculated from areas under survival curves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Long-term light alcohol intake, that is &lt;=20 g per day, compared with no alcohol, was strongly and inversely associated with cerebrovascular (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.70), total cardiovascular (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91). Independent of total alcohol intake, long-term wine consumption of, on average, less than half a glass per day was strongly and inversely associated with coronary heart disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.89), total cardiovascular (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.86) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.87). These results could not be explained by differences in socioeconomic status. Life expectancy was about 5 years longer in men who consumed wine compared with those who did not use alcoholic beverages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Long-term light alcohol intake lowered cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risk and increased life expectancy. Light wine consumption was associated with 5 years longer life expectancy; however, more studies are needed to verify this result.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Streppel, M T, Ocke, M C, Boshuizen, H C, Kok, F J, Kromhout, D]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Mortality and morbidity]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.082198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Long-term wine consumption is related to cardiovascular mortality and life expectancy independently of moderate alcohol intake: the Zutphen Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>534</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Association between lung function and disability in African-Americans]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Impaired lung function is independently associated with higher rates of disability; however, few studies have examined the extent to which this relationship varies by sex. Because men are less likely to have disability, it is expected that the relationship between lung function and disability will be greater among women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Logistic regression models were specified to examine the relationship between lung function and disability in 689 African&ndash;American men and women participating in the Carolina African American Twin Study of Aging. Disability was defined as difficulty in performing at least one of seven basic activities of daily living. Impaired lung function was defined as per cent of predicted peak expiratory flow (PEF) &lt;80.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Accounting for demographic and health-related characteristics, women who had impaired lung function had a higher odds (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.06) of being disabled than those with normal lung function. Impaired lung function was unrelated to disability in men.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Lung function appears to vary by sex in this sample of African&ndash;Americans. Furthermore, among women, lung function should be considered as an important indicator of health. Every effort should be made to improve lung function in African&ndash;Americans, but interventions and health promoting strategies may need to be sex specific.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thorpe, R J, Szanton, S L, Whitfield, K]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Twin studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.084418</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Association between lung function and disability in African-Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Primary birthing attendants and birth outcomes in remote Inuit communities--a natural "experiment" in Nunavik, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>There is a lack of data on the safety of midwife-led maternity care in remote or indigenous communities. In a <I>de facto</I> natural "experiment", birth outcomes were assessed by primary birthing attendant in two sets of remote Inuit communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A geocoding-based retrospective birth cohort study in 14 Inuit communities of Nunavik, Canada, 1989&ndash;2000: primary birth attendants were Inuit midwives in the Hudson Bay (1529 Inuit births) vs western physicians in Ungava Bay communities (1197 Inuit births). The primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included stillbirth, neonatal death, post-neonatal death, preterm, small-for-gestational-age and low birthweight birth. Multilevel logistic regression was used to obtain the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) controlling for maternal age, marital status, parity, education, infant sex and plurality, community size and community-level random effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The aORs (95% confidence interval) for perinatal death comparing the Hudson Bay vs Ungava Bay communities were 1.29 (0.63 to 2.64) for all Inuit births and 1.13 (0.48 to 2.47) for Inuit births at &gt;=28 weeks of gestation. There were no statistically significant differences in the crude or adjusted risks of any of the outcomes examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Risks of perinatal death were somewhat but not significantly higher in the Hudson Bay communities with midwife-led maternity care compared with the Ungava Bay communities with physician-led maternity care. These findings are inconclusive, although the results excluding extremely preterm births are more reassuring concerning the safety of midwife-led maternity care in remote indigenous communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simonet, F, Wilkins, R, Labranche, E, Smylie, J, Heaman, M, Martens, P, Fraser, W D, Minich, K, Wu, Y, Carry, C, Luo, Z-C]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Cohort studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.080598</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Primary birthing attendants and birth outcomes in remote Inuit communities--a natural "experiment" in Nunavik, Canada]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Human immunodeficiency virus testing uptake and risk behaviours in Spain]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of human immunodeficiency (HIV) testing in the general population; to analyse factors related to voluntary testing; and to describe the main reasons for testing, the kinds of health services where testing takes place and the relations between self-risk perception and HIV testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A probability sample survey of health and sexual behaviour in men and women aged 18&ndash;49 years and resident in Spain in 2003 (n = 10 980) was used. A combination of face-to-face and computer-assisted self-interview was used, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Some 39.4% (40.2% in men and 38.5% in women) had ever been tested, blood donation being the main reason for men and pregnancy for women. In the multivariate analysis, HIV testing was associated with foreign nationality, high educational level, having injected drugs and having a large number of sexual partners. In men, it was also associated with age 30&ndash;39 years, having had sex with other men and having paid for sex. About 29.3% of men and 32.8% of women had their last voluntary HIV test in primary healthcare centres, whereas only 3.4% of men and 3.6% of women had last been tested in sexually transmitted infection/HIV diagnostic centres. About 20.2% of men and 5.5% of women with risk behaviours had never been tested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The proportion of men with risk behaviours who have never had an HIV test is unacceptably high in Spain. Scaling up access to HIV testing in this population group remains a challenge for health policies and research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de la Fuente, L, Suarez, M, Belza, M J, Vallejo, F, Garcia, M, Alvarez, R, Castilla, J, Rodes, A, The Health and Sexual Behaviour Survey Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.076240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Human immunodeficiency virus testing uptake and risk behaviours in Spain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>558</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Medium-term effects of Italian smoke-free legislation: findings from four annual population-based surveys]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Italy was the first large country to ban smoking in all indoor public places, including restaurants and bars. The aim of this study was to quantify, 3 years after the law came into force, the effects of the smoking ban in terms of observance of the legislation and change of habits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Data were considered from four representative surveys on smoking, conducted between 2005 and 2008 on a total of 12 245 individuals (5906 men and 6339 women) aged 15 years or over.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>In 2008, more than 80% of Italians (more than 90% in northern Italy) had the perception that the smoking ban was respected in bars/cafes and restaurants, despite a slight reduction since 2005. In all the surveys combined, 75% of the Italian population reported that the smoking ban was respected in workplaces. Overall, approximately 10% of Italians reported that, after the implementation of the tobacco regulation, they went to bars/cafes and restaurants more frequently, and approximately 7% less frequently, than before.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The study shows that in Italy the smoke-free legislation did not affect the business of restaurants and bars, and remains widely respected 3 years after the law came into force.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tramacere, I, Gallus, S, Fernandez, E, Zuccaro, P, Colombo, P, La Vecchia, C]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Smoking and tobacco, Epidemiologic studies, Population-base studies, Health education, Health promotion, Smoking]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.084426</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Medium-term effects of Italian smoke-free legislation: findings from four annual population-based surveys]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>562</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Exposure to interparental violence and psychosocial maladjustment in the adult life course: advocacy for early prevention]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Early family-level and social-level stressors are both assumed to be the components of two main path models explaining the association between exposure to interparental violence in childhood and its long-term consequences on mental health explored through life-course epidemiological studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims:</st>
<p>To investigate the association between exposure to interparental violence in childhood and mental health outcomes in adulthood when taking into account early family and social stressors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A retrospective French cohort study of 3023 adults representative of the general population in the Paris metropolitan area was conducted in 2005 through at-home, face-to-face interviews. The outcomes measures were current depression and lifetime suicide attempt, intimate partner violence, violence against children and alcohol dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The adults exposed to interparental violence during childhood had a higher risk of psychosocial maladjustment. After adjusting for family- and social-level stressors in childhood, this risk was, respectively, 1.44 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.00) for depression, 3.17 (1.75 to 5.73) for conjugal violence, 4.75 (1.60 to 14.14) for child maltreatment and 1.75 (1.19 to 2.57) for alcohol dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>The adult consequences of parental violence in childhood&mdash;and this independently of the other forms of domestic violence and the related psychosocial risks&mdash;should lead to intensifying the prevention of and screening for this form of maltreatment of children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roustit, C, Renahy, E, Guernec, G, Lesieur, S, Parizot, I, Chauvin, P]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Cohort studies, Domestic violence, Suicide (psychiatry), Screening (epidemiology), Abuse (child, partner, elder), Alcohol, Health education, Health promotion, Screening (public health), Suicide (public health), Violence against women]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.077750</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Exposure to interparental violence and psychosocial maladjustment in the adult life course: advocacy for early prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>568</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] A cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>The extent to which welfare states may influence health outcomes has not been explored. It was hypothesised that policies which target the poor are associated with greater income inequality in oral health quality of life than those that provide earnings-related benefits to all citizens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Data were from nationally representative surveys in the UK (n = 4064), Finland (n = 5078), Germany (n = 1454) and Australia (n = 2292) conducted from 1998 to 2002. The typology of Korpi and Palme classifies these countries into four different welfare states. In each survey, subjects completed the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire, which evaluates the adverse consequence of dental conditions on quality of life. For each country, survey estimation commands were used to create linear regression models that estimated the slope of the gradient between four quartiles of income and OHIP-14 severity scores. Parameter estimates for income gradients were contrasted across countries using Wald <sup>2</sup> tests specifying a critical p value of 0.008, equivalent to a Bonferroni correction of p&lt;0.05 for the six pairwise tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Statistically significant income gradients in OHIP-14 severity scores were found in all countries except Germany. A global test confirmed significant cross-national differences in the magnitude of income gradients. In Australia, where a flat rate of benefits targeted the poor, the mean OHIP-14 severity score reduced by 1.7 units (95% CI &ndash;2.15 to &ndash;1.34) with each increasing quartile of household income, a significantly steeper gradient than in other countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The coverage and generosity of welfare state benefits appear to influence levels of inequality in population oral health quality of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanders, A E, Slade, G D, John, M T, Steele, J G, Suominen-Taipale, A L, Lahti, S, Nuttall, N M, Allen, P F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health service research, Sociology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.083238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] A cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>574</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Social inequality in the prevalence of depressive disorders]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Uncertainties exist about the strength of the relation between socioeconomic position and depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between education, occupation, employment and income and depressive disorders measured as minor and major depression, as well as antidepressant prescriptions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Data were collected from a Danish cross-sectional study collected year 2000, comprising 9254 subjects, 55% women, and aged 36&ndash;56 years. Register-based information on education, income and prescription were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The prevalence of major depression DSM-IV algorithm was 3.3% among men and women, whereas minor depression and prescriptions revealed statistically significant higher prevalence among females. A social gradient was found for all depressive end-points with the strongest estimates related to major depressive disorder (MDD). The associations were as follows: MDD and low education odds ratio (OR) 2.38 (CI 95% 1.68 to 3.37), MDD and non-employment OR 11.67 (CI 95% 8.06 to 16.89), MDD and low income OR 9.78 (CI 95% 6.49 to 14.74). Education only explained a minor part of the association between non-employment and depressive disorders and no associations were found between education and prescription. This indicates a strong two-way association between depression and non-employment, low-income respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>A social gradient in depressive disorders was found regardless of socioeconomic position being measured by education, occupation, employment or income. Severe socioeconomic consequences of depression are indicated by the fact that the associations with non-employment and low income were much stronger than the association with low education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, I, Thielen, K, Nygaard, E, Diderichsen, F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Cross-sectional studies, Sociology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.082719</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Research reports] Social inequality in the prevalence of depressive disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Evidence-based public health policy and practice] Effects of dietary fibre intake on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in subjects at high risk]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Epidemiological studies and feeding trials with supplements suggest that fibre intake is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk. However, the effects of changes in dietary fibre on risk factor levels have not been evaluated in free-living individuals. Thus, the effects of changes in dietary fibre intake on cardiovascular risk factors were assessed over 3 months in free-living high-risk subjects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>772 high-risk subjects (age 69&plusmn;5 years) were assigned to a low-fat diet or two Mediterranean-style diets. All participants received behavioural and nutritional education, including recommendations for increasing the consumption of vegetables, fruits, and legumes. Changes in food and nutrient intake, body weight, blood pressure, lipid profiles, glucose control and inflammatory markers were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Most participants increased consumption of vegetable products, but the increase in dietary fibre exhibited wide between-subject variability (6&ndash;65 g/day). Body weight, waist circumference, and mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased across quintiles of fibre intake (p&lt;0.005; all). Reductions in fasting glucose and total cholesterol levels, and increments in HDL cholesterol were highest among participants in the upper 20% of fibre intake (p = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). Plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein, but not those of inflammatory cytokines, decreased in parallel with increasing dietary fibre (p = 0.04). Significant reductions in LDL cholesterol were observed only among participants with the greatest increases in soluble fibre intake (p = 0.04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>Increasing dietary fibre intake with natural foods is associated with reductions in classical and novel cardiovascular risk factors in a high-risk cohort.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estruch, R, Martinez-Gonzalez, M A, Corella, D, Basora-Gallisa, J, Ruiz-Gutierrez, V, Covas, M I, Fiol, M, Gomez-Gracia, E, Lopez-Sabater, M C, Escoda, R, Pena, M A, Diez-Espino, J, Lahoz, C, Lapetra, J, Saez, G, Ros, E, on behalf of the PREDIMED Study Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.082214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Evidence-based public health policy and practice] Effects of dietary fibre intake on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in subjects at high risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Evidence-based public health policy and practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Can we better prevent binge drinking?]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waszkiewicz, N, Szulc, A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.084343</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Can we better prevent binge drinking?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>589</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Epidemiology and the Nobel prize]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/589-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saracci, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2009.089375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Epidemiology and the Nobel prize]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Faulty analysis or unsuitable data?]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bird, S M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Faulty analysis or unsuitable data?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Offspring sex ratio at birth in mountain climbers]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/590-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saadat, M, Khalili, M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.078824</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Offspring sex ratio at birth in mountain climbers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>591</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Author's response]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knox, E G]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2009.089045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Author's response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>591</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>591</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Injury Epidemiology: Research and Control Strategies, 3rd edition]]></title>
<link>http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/63/7/591-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segui-Gomez, M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/jech.2007.073007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] Injury Epidemiology: Research and Control Strategies, 3rd edition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>63</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>592</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>591</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>