Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study
  1. David H Brewster1,
  2. Diane L Stockton1,
  3. Richard Dobbie1,
  4. Diana Bull2,
  5. Valerie Beral2
  1. 1Information Services, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr D H Brewster
 Information Services, NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK; david.brewsterisd.csa.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Study objective: To assess the risk of breast cancer in patients with a previous history of miscarriage or induced abortion.

Design: Case-control study relating “exposure” to outcome by linkage of national hospital discharge and maternity records, the national cancer registry, and death records.

Setting: Scotland.

Participants: Miscarriage analysis—2828 women with breast cancer and 9781 matched controls; induced abortion analysis—2833 women with breast cancer and 9888 matched controls.

Main results: After stratification for age at diagnosis, parity, and age at first birth, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of breast cancer was 1.02 (0.88 to 1.18) in women with a previous miscarriage, and 0.80 (0.72 to 0.89) in women with a previous induced abortion. Further adjustments for age at bilateral oophorectomy, socioeconomic status (based on small area of residence), and health board area of residence had only minor effects on these odds ratios.

Conclusion: These data do not support the hypothesis that miscarriage or induced abortion represent substantive risk factors for the future development of breast cancer.

  • abortion
  • breast cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Linked Articles

  • In this issue
    Carlos Alvarez-Dardet John R Ashton